2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
2.10.2
Linda
Dettmer
A
total
of
seven
significant
unavoidable
traffic
impacts
are
identified
in
Table
2-1
of
the
Draft
EIR
(Impacts
4.N-1,
2,
3,
4,
5
[DSP-V
scenario
only]),
7,
and
8.
All
feasible
mitigation
has
been
applied
to
address
the
significant
impacts
identified
in
Section
4.N,
Traffic
and
Circulation
,
of
the
Draft
EIR.
Impact
4.N-1.
As
noted
in
Table
2-1,
mitigation
measures
are
available
to
achieve
acceptable
levels
of
service
for
four
of
the
six
intersections
for
which
significant
unavoidable
traffic
impacts
are
identified;
however,
those
intersections
are
not
maintained
by
the
City
of
Brisbane,
and
the
City
does
not
have
the
authority
to
impose
mitigation
measures
on
other
agencies.
Thus,
impacts
are
considered
to
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
Impact
4.N-3.
As
noted
in
Table
2-1,
mitigation
measures
are
available
to
achieve
acceptable
levels
of
service
for
6
of
the
13
intersections
for
which
significant
unavoidable
traffic
impacts
are
identified;
however,
those
intersections
are
not
maintained
by
the
City
of
Brisbane,
and
the
City
does
not
have
the
authority
to
impose
mitigation
measures
on
other
agencies.
Thus,
impacts
are
considered
to
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
Impact
4.N-4
.
This
impact
addresses
freeway
mainline
segments
over
which
the
City
of
Brisbane
has
no
control
to
impose
mitigation
measures.
As
noted
in
the
Draft
EIR,
Caltrans
has
no
plans
for
widening
of
the
US
101
freeway.
Impact
4.N-7
.
As
noted
in
Table
2-1,
Project
site
development
will
be
required
to
pay
fair
share
mitigation
fees
to
mitigate
impacts
to
San
Francisco
Muni
and
SamTrans
transit
services.
However,
because
the
City
of
Brisbane
does
not
have
authority
to
direct
the
use
of
those
fair
share
payments,
impacts
are
considered
to
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
Impact
4.N-8
.
As
noted
in
Table
2-1,
Project
site
development
will
be
required
to
pay
fair
share
mitigation
fees
to
mitigate
impacts
to
San
Francisco
MTA
transit
services.
However,
because
the
City
of
Brisbane
does
not
have
authority
to
direct
the
use
of
those
fair
share
payments,
impacts
are
considered
to
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
[See
page
for
the
original
comment]
The
Draft
EIR
identified
a
less
than
significant
impact
with
regard
to
Diesel
Particulate
Matter
(DPM)
from
Project
Site
development
construction
activities,
including
construction-related
truck
trips
in
Draft
EIR
Impact
4.B-3,
based
on
a
site-specific
health
risk
assessment
of
proposed
Baylands
development
that
accounted
for
diesel
truck
trips
to
transport
soil
and
vendor
truck
trips
to
transport
building
materials.
Therefore,
mitigation
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.2-1
May
2015