2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
Allocation
Plan
(IWSAP)
was
created
to
implement
supply
delivery
reductions
for
the
SFPUC
and
it’s
Wholesale
Customers
(as
a
whole)
of
up
to
20
percent.
Under
normal
hydrologic
conditions,
Wholesale
Customers
receive
69.4
percent
(184
mgd)
of
the
SFPUC
annual
total
supply
(265
mgd).
A
20-percent
systemwide
drought
reduction
scenario
results
in
a
28
percent
reduction
in
deliveries
to
the
Wholesale
Customer
group;
the
delivery
cutback
percentage
to
individual
agencies
within
the
Wholesale
Customer
group
could
be
higher.
Thus,
as
one
of
the
Wholesale
Customer,
Brisbane
must
already
prepare
for
and
accommodate
significant
supply
reductions
in
dry
years.
Gutekanst-3
[See page
5-561 for the original comment]
Please
see
Response Gutekanst-2,
above,
which
indicates
that
during
a
drought
the
SFPUC
implements
its
adopted
drought
response
program
that
triggers
several
actions
including
agreed
upon
cutbacks
by
all
of
the
wholesale
customers,
including
Brisbane.
Further,
as
described
in
the
Baylands
Draft
EIR,
Brisbane
proposes
to
secure
a
separate
additional
water
supply
for
the
Baylands
development
(through
the
OID
water
transfer)
and
would
not
rely
on
its
existing
SFPUC
supplies
for
this
new
development.
In
addition,
as
described
on
pages
4.O-30
to
4.O-31
and
analyzed
on
pages
4.O-31
through
4.O-44,
the
Specific
Plan
includes
an
aggressive
water
savings
program
that
reduces
water
demands
from
the
Project
Site
development,
including
a
recycled
water
plant
to
provide
water
for
irrigation
purposes.
[See page
5-561 for the original comment]
Please
refer
to
Master Response 29
for
a
discussion
of
the
alternative
supply
and
conservation
options
considered
as
part
of
the
project
development
effort.
[See page
5-561 for the original comment]
See
Master Response
3
for
discussion
of
the
implementation
and
enforceability
of
mitigation
measures.
See
Final
EIR
Chapter
4.0,
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Program
,
for
specifics
regarding
implementation
and
enforcement
of
each
mitigation
measure
set
forth
in
the
Baylands
EIR.
[See page
5-562 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 19
for
discussion
of
the
compatibility
of
proposed
Baylands
development
with
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm
and
Master Response 20
for
discussion
of
the
compatibility
of
proposed
Baylands
development
with
the
Recology
facility.
Relocation
of
the
existing
lumberyards
is
proposed
as
part
of
proposed
Project
site
development
under
each
development
scenario
and
the
impacts
of
such
relocation
are
addressed
as
part
of
the
analysis
of
proposed
development
scenarios.
See
Response SFOM-6
for
discussion
of
the
potential
for
a
high-speed
rail
maintenance
yard
within
the
Baylands.
The
Renewable
Energy
Generation
Alternative
analyzed
in
Draft
EIR
Chapter
5,
Alternatives
,
addresses
a
potential
development
pattern
for
the
Baylands
that
would
emphasize
renewable
energy
generation.
Gutekanst-4
Gutekanst-5
Gutekanst-6
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.5-2
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page