2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
2.10.10
Roland
Lebrun
Lebrun-1
[See page
5-598 for the original comment]
Alternatives
are
addressed
in
Draft
EIR
Chapter
5.
According
to
the
CEQA
Guidelines,
an
EIR
must
describe
a
reasonable
range
of
alternatives
to
the
proposed
project,
or
to
its
location,
that
would
feasibly
attain
most
of
the
project's
basic
objectives
while
reducing
or
avoiding
any
of
its
significant
effects.
While
the
alternative
described
in
this
comment
could
accommodate
trains
along
the
Caltrain
rail
line
at
higher
speeds,
it
does
not
meet
CEQA’s
requirements
for
an
EIR
alternative,
as
it
would
not
reduce
any
of
the
significant
and
unavoidable
impacts
of
proposed
Project
Site
development
evaluated
in
the
Draft
EIR,
nor
would
it
achieve
any
of
the
City’s
objectives
for
Baylands
development
as
set
forth
in
the
Draft
EIR.
[See page
5-600 for the original comment]
See
Response Lebrun-1.
[See page
5-601 for the original comment]
See
Response Lebrun-1.
Lebrun-2
Lebrun-3
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.10-1
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page