2.
Response
to
Comment
2.4
Master
Responses
to
Comments
applicable
human
health
and
e
cological
risk
criteria
based
on
the
Tank
Farm’s
industrial
land
use,
where
groundwater
is
not
being
used
as
a
source
of
drinking
water
and
surface
water
is
an
estuarine
environment.
The
RAP
also
proposed
groundwater
cleanup
goals
and
identified
preferred
remedial
actions
and
steps
for
RAP
implementation.
Due
to
the
general
success
of
remedial
actions
prior
to
the
RAP,
the
RWQCB
accepted
monitored
natural
attenuation
as
the
remedial
action
to
be
implemented
at
the
Tank
Farm,
and
ordered
that
the
RAP
be
implemented
immediately.
Thus,
remediation
activities
at
the
Tank
Farm
will
avoid
creation
of
water
quality
problems
between
the
Tank
Farm
and
proposed
Baylands
development.
Land
Use
As
proposed
in
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios,
industrial
and
open
space
land
uses
would
immediately
surround
the
Tank
Farm.
The
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
would
also
surround
the
Tank
Farm
with
open
space,
although
a
charter
high
school
is
proposed
to
the
southwest
of
the
Tank
Farm,
west
of
the
Caltrain
tracks.
The
passive
open
space
areas
proposed
in
all
four
development
scenarios
would
provide
the
physical
separation
from
the
Tank
Farm
needed
for
proposed
commercial,
office,
institutional,
and
residential
(DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
only)
uses.
The
charter
high
school
proposed
in
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
would
be
separated
from
the
Tank
Farm
by
the
Caltrain
tracks
but
would
be
located
within
0.25
mile
of
the
Tank
Farm,
close
enough
to
be
an
incompatible
use
and
resulting
in
a
significant
impact
as
described
on
page
4.G-99
of
the
Draft
EIR.
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-3
specifies
that
Grade
K-12
school
facilities
shall
not
be
located
within
0.25
mile
of
a
facility
with
hazardous
emissions
or
that
handles
hazardous
or
acutely
hazardous
materials,
substances,
or
waste,
unless
approved
by
the
School
Facilities
Planning
Division
of
the
California
Department
of
Education
in
conformance
with
California
Code
of
Regulations
(CCR)
Title
5,
Section
14010,
which
sets
forth
California
Department
of
Education
criteria
for
school
site
locations.
The
industrial
uses
proposed
to
the
east
of
the
Tank
Farm
in
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
would
not
require
physical
separation
from
the
Tank
Farm.
Noise
The
Tank
Farm
is
a
noise-tolerant
land
use
and
would
not
be
affected
by
noise
from
construction
or
operation
of
proposed
development
within
the
Baylands.
Because
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
would
surround
the
Tank
Farm
with
a
combination
of
open
space
and
industrial
uses,
and
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
would
surround
the
Tank
Farm
with
open
space
uses,
land
use
conflicts
associated
with
stationary
noise
sources
would
not
occur.
In
addition,
routing
of
Tank
Farm-related
truck
traffic
to
US
Highway
101
via
Lagoon
Road,
Sierra
Point
Parkway,
and
Bayshore
Boulevard
would
avoid
potential
land
use
conflicts
between
truck
traffic
from
the
Tank
Farm
and
proposed
uses
within
the
Baylands.
Traffic
Because
the
Tank
Farm
is
an
existing
use,
proposed
Baylands
development
has
accounted
for
Tank
Farm-related
traffic
within
existing
conditions.
As
discussed
on
page
4.N-151
of
the
Draft
EIR,
each
of
the
four
Project
Site
development
scenarios
would
include
the
construction
of
new
roadways
to
facilitate
emergency
access
to
locations
within
the
Project
Site.
Existing
emergency
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.4-61
May
2015