2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
The
Daly
City
2030
General
Plan
also
provides
analysis
for
future
conditions.
The
land
use
data
indicates
that
development
within
the
Brisbane
Baylands
is
included
in
the
Daly
City
General
Plan
analysis
of
cumulative
conditions,
as
approximately
3,700
households
and
10,000
jobs
added
between
2010
and
2035.
Therefore,
the
LOS
results
from
the
Daly
City
2030
General
Plan
are
indicative
of
how
the
intersection
would
operate
with
Project
Site
development-related
trips
on
the
roadway
network.
Under
cumulative
conditions,
the
intersection
of
East
Market
Street
/
Mission
Street
/
San
Pedro
Road
is
projected
to
operate
at
LOS
E
in
both
AM
and
PM
peak
periods.
The
intersection
of
Hillside
Boulevard
/
East
Market
Street
is
projected
to
operate
at
LOS
C
in
both
AM
and
PM
peak
periods.
The
degradation
of
the
former
intersection
to
unacceptable
conditions,
as
outlined
by
the
Daly
City
impact
guidelines,
would
be
in
part
due
to
Project
Site
development-generated
trips
from
the
Brisbane
Baylands.
However,
the
City
of
Daly
City
does
not
identify
any
feasible
mitigation
measures
for
this
intersection
due
to
economic,
environmental,
and
legal
factors.
Therefore,
a
significant
and
unavoidable
cumulative
impact
would
exist
at
this
intersection,
the
Baylands
contribution
to
which
would
be
cumulatively
considerable.
CDC-2
[See page
5-51 for the original comment]
The
comment
states
that
the
analysis
assumes
transit
and
roadway
improvements
that
have
not
been
approved
nor
funded.
It
also
claims
that
some
mitigation
measures
rely
upon
the
actions
of
an
outside
government
agency,
such
as
Daly
City,
rather
than
the
project
developer
or
government
agency
where
the
project
is
located.
The
comment
notes
that
mitigation
of
project
impacts
is
the
responsibility
of
the
project
to
fund,
obtain
approval
for,
and
construct.
See
Master
Response
21
for
discussion
of
the
d
eveloper’s
responsibility
for
construction
of
infrastructure.
Some
of
the
proposed
mitigation
measures
rely
on
jurisdictions
outside
of
the
City
of
Brisbane
to
approve
or
implement.
In
the
case
of
roadway
improvements
to
which
proposed
Baylands
development
generates
some
of
the
need
for
improvement
in
jurisdictions
outside
of
Brisbane,
EIR
mitigation
measures
require
that
the
improvements
shall,
to
the
extent
permitted
by
agencies
with
jurisdiction
over
the
intersection,
be
constructed
and
accepted
for
public
maintenance
prior
to
issuance
of
occupancy
permits
for
any
site-
specific
development
that
would
(1)
result
in
reducing
the
intersection
to
below
the
acceptable
LOS
standard,
or
(2)
contribute
additional
traffic
to
the
intersection
if
it
is
already
operating
below
the
agencies’
acceptable
LOS
standard.
The
Draft
EIR’s
conclusion
for
such
mitigations
acknowledges
that
the
measure
is
outside
the
control
of
City
of
Brisbane,
implementation
is
uncertain,
and
as
a
result,
the
impact
would
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
If
the
outside
agency
were
to
approve
implementation
of
the
mitigation
measure,
then
development
within
the
Baylands
site
shall
contribute
its
fair
share
of
the
cost
of
the
mitigation.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.2-2
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page