potential light and glare, air quality, bird strike, and greenhouse gas emissions impacts.

Page 4.P-16      OSEC-398[See page 5-359 for the original comment] REVISE the fifth paragraph as follows:

As previously noted, existing electrical consumption within the Project Site is 8,084.6 megawatt hours, including the Recology facility. Thus, under all Project Site development scenarios, even with proposed onsite renewable energy generation, increases in electrical consumption would be substantial.

Page 4.P-17      OSEC-395 [See page 5-358 for the original comment] and UPC 2-20 [See page 5-534 for the original comment] REVISE the final paragraph as follows.

The threshold for this impact also considers whether Project Site development’s energy consumption would be wasteful. To reduce natural gas consumption rates, and ensure that wasteful use of natural gas is avoided, Mitigation Measure 4.P-2a requires Project Site development to exceed the Title 24 energy efficiency standards effective as of the date of certification of this EIR by at least 20 percent all new buildings subject to the provisions of Brisbane Municipal Code Section 15.80 to achieve a LEED Gold rating, rather than the LEED Silver rating now required by the Municipal Code. In addition, all appliances installed as part of original building construction are to be ENERGY STAR rated or equivalent.

Page 4.P-18      OSEC-396[See page 5-359 for the original comment] REVISE Mitigation Measure 4.P-2b as follows.

Mitigation Measure 4.P-2b: All street and parking lot lighting within the Project Site shall be energy efficient light emitting diode (LED) based lighting, until a more efficient technology for street and parking lot lighting acceptable to the City of Brisbane becomes commercially available, at which time all street and parking lot lighting shall be the most energy efficient technology that is commercially available for street and parking lot lighting and that is also acceptable to the City of Brisbane.

Page 4.P-18      OSEC-397[See page 5-359 for the original comment] REVISE Mitigation Measure 4.P-2c as follows.

Mitigation Measure 4.P-2c: Should the CPP scenario be selected, Project Site development shall provide for an equivalent amount of onsite renewable energy generation as is proposed in the DSP scenario (currently estimated to be 42,000 to 45,000 megawatt hours annually). Should the CPP-V scenario be selected, Project Site development shall provide for an equivalent amount of onsite renewable energy generation as is proposed in the DSP scenario (currently estimated to be 42,000 to 45,000 megawatt