2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
Dilworth
2-18
[See page
5-552 for the original comment]
While
an
early
Final
Closure
and
Postclosure
Maintenance
Plan
for
the
former
landfill
was
conditionally
approved
by
the
RWQCB
in
2003,
due
to
changes
in
proposed
land
uses
and
advances
in
technologies,
a
new
Final
Closure
and
Postclosure
Maintenance
Plan
will
be
required.
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
Dilworth
2-19
[See page
5-552 for the original comment]
Proposed
Project
Site
development
will
be
required
to
mitigate
impacts
on
wetlands
and
to
provide
restored
wetlands
in
accordance
with
Mitigation
Measures
4.C-1g,
4.C-2a,
4.C-2b,
4.C-2c,
and
4.C-4b.
In
addition,
Project
Site
development
will
be
subject
to
permits
from
state
and
federal
law,
which
may
impose
additional
mitigation
requirements.
The
previous
plan
referred
to
in
this
comment
is
not
part
of
Proposed
Project
site
development,
and
the
EIR
makes
no
assertion
as
to
whether
the
earlier
plan
is
adequate
or
should
be
approved
and
implemented.
Dilworth
2-20
[See page
5-553 for the original comment]
The
comment
does
not
provide
substantiation
for
its
conclusion
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
compaction
recommendation
cited
on
page
16
of
Draft
EIR
Appendix
H.2.
As
required
by
Title
27
CCR
21190,
long-term
maintenance
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
final
cover
system
of
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
is
required.
The
final
landfill
cover
will
be
required
to
provide
for
future
construction
of
building
pads,
utility
corridors,
and
designated
open
spaces
for
the
uses
approved
by
the
City
of
Brisbane.
In
addition,
all
buildings
and
other
construction
within
the
former
landfill
area
following
its
Title
27
closure
will
be
required
to
comply
with
the
provisions
of
the
California
Building
Code
to
ensure
that
adequate
foundations
are
provided
and
structural
requirements
are
met.
See
Master Response
5
for
discussion
of
compliance
with
the
law
as
mitigation
under
CEQA.
Dilworth
2-21
[See page
5-553 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process
and
Master Response 15
for
discussion
regarding
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
As
part
of
its
requirements
for
Title
27
landfill
closure,
the
RWQCB
will
review
the
adequacy
of
the
existing
leachate
collection
and
control
system
to
prevent
any
leachate
from
exceeding
regulatory
standards.
Based
on
that
determination,
the
RWQCB
will
set
specific
requirements
for
needed
upgrades,
expansions,
or
replacement
of
the
existing
leachate
system.
Dilworth
2-22
[See page
5-553 for the original comment]
The
DLMP
(GeoSyntec,
2008)
also
identifies
potential
contingency
leachate
mitigation
measures
in
case
leachate
management
objectives
are
not
met
by
construction
of
the
final
cover
system.
As
discussed
in
Master Response 13,
Title
27
closure
of
the
former
Brisbane
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.3-10
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page