2.
Response
to
Comments
2.7
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Special
Districts
2.7
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Special
Districts
2.7.1
Bayshore
Sanitary
District
BSD-1
[See page
5-39 for the original comment]
Draft
EIR
page
4.O-46
sets
the
stage
for
the
analysis
leading
to
the
following
conclusion
on
page
4.O-47:
Based
on
existing
and
projected
wastewater
flows
from
the
BSD
and
the
City
to
the
SFPUC,
development
of
the
Project
Site
with
or
without
the
onsite
recycled
water
plant
would
not
exceed
either
the
BSD’s
or
the
City’s
contractual
capacity
for
wastewater
treatment
by
the
SFPUC.
Further,
the
Recology
site
wastewater
discharge
to
the
SFPUC
would
only
increase
by
approximately
0.002
mgd.
Therefore,
adequate
treatment
capacity
at
the
SFPUC
would
be
available
for
wastewater
generated
within
the
Project
Site,
and
impacts
would
be
less
than
significant.
Wastewater
generated
by
development
within
the
Project
Site
is
proposed
to
be
discharged
into
the
BSD
system
for
treatment
at
the
SFPUC
SEP.
Midway
through
the
Project
Site
development
buildout
(about
year
15),
an
onsite
recycled
water
plant
would
be
constructed
to
produce
recycled
water
to
meet
non-potable
water
needs
on
the
Project
Site
and
reduce
potable
water
demand.
The
recycled
water
plant
would
therefore
reduce
the
liquid
wastewater
flows
requiring
offset
conveyance
and
treatment.
Adequate
conveyance
and
treatment
capacity
are
available
in
the
BSD
and
SFPUC
SEP
systems
under
existing
contract
arrangements
to
handle
wastewater
flows
from
Project
Site
development.
As
a
result,
wastewater
flows
from
Project
Site
development
would
be
properly
treated
and
disposed
of
through
facilities
that
comply
with
SFRWQCB
wastewater
treatment
requirements
and
impacts
would
be
less
than
significant.
BSD-2
[See page
5-40 for the original comment]
This
comment
refers
to
a
meeting
held
between
the
District
and
the
applicant
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios,
and
does
not
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
[See page
5-40 for the original comment]
This
comment
refers
to
options
for
future
use
of
the
District’s
Carlyle
pumping
station
as
part
of
future
site
development
within
the
Baylands,
and
expresses
the
District’s
preference
for
one
of
the
two
options
discussed
between
the
District
and
the
applicant
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios.
See
Response
BSD-4.
BSD-3
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.7.1-1
May
2015
Next Page