2.
Response
to
Comments
2.6
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Regional
Agencies
2.6
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Regional
Agencies
2.6.1
Bay
Area
Water
Supply
and
Water
Conservation
Agency
BAWSCA-1
[See page
5-25 for the original comment]
See
Master
Response
1,
which
discusses
why
a
program
EIR
was
prepared
at
this
stage
of
project
review
and
explains
that
subsequent
site-specific
development
proposals,
including
approvals
related
to
the
proposed
water
supply
agreement
and
site
remediation,
will
require
subsequent
project-level
CEQA
evaluation.
Also
see
Master
Response
29,
which
reviews
the
potential
impacts
to
the
SFPUC
system
and
the
wholesale
customers
addressed
in
the
program
EIR
and
outlines
the
potential
impact
issues
to
be
addressed
in
more
detail
in
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
review.
[See page
5-25 for the original comment]
See
Master
Response
29.
[See
page
5-25
for
the
original
comment]
Please
see
Master
Response
29
for
a
discussion
of
subsequent
project-level
CEQA
review
of
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer
.
[See page
5-26 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 29.
[See page
5-26 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 29.
[See page
5-26 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 29.
[See page
5-26 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 29.
[See
page
5-26
for
the
original
comment]
See
Master Response 29.
BAWSCA-2
BAWSCA-3
BAWSCA-4
BAWSCA-5
BAWSCA-6
BAWSCA-7
BAWSCA-8
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.6.1-1
May
2015
Next Page