2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
considered
significant
to
history
(CRHR
criterion
D
information
potential)
nor
would
it
substantially
add
to
the
body
of
academic
knowledge
about
railroads
that
is
already
available.
In
the
event
that
unrecorded
archaeological
deposits
related
to
the
railroad-era
were
encountered
during
Project
Site
development-
related
ground-disturbing
activities
Mitigation
Measure
4.D-2
would
apply.
Hart-9
[See page
5-567 for the original comment]
As
Project
Site
development
would
have
no
direct
or
indirect
effects
on
sea
level
rise,
this
comment
does
not
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
or
issues
related
to
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
and
no
further
response
is
required.
Based
on
the
proposed
grading
plan,
no
change
is
elevation
is
proposed
for
the
Roundhouse,
and
it
would
not
be
subject
to
flooding,
even
when
accounting
for
100
years
of
project
sea
level
rise.
[See page
5-567 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 29
for
discussion
of
potential
desalination
as
an
alternative
to
the
proposed
water
supply
agreement.
Hart-10
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.7-3
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page