2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
2.10.9
Steven
Johnson
[See
page
for
the
original
comment]
This
introductory
comment
appears
to
be
based
on
a
series
of
e-mails
between
the
commenter
and
the
RWQCB’s
project
manager,
all
of
which
were
exchanged
prior
to
the
release
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
See
The
suite
of
proposed
remediation
technologies
currently
proposed
for
the
Baylands
are
described
in
Draft
Section
4.G,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials
.
The
ultimate
determination
of
the
specific
remediation
technologies
to
be
employed
in
and
landfill
closure
will
be
determined
by
the
applicable
regulatory
authorities,
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC.
See
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
See
and
It
will
be
the
responsibility
of
the
RWQCB
to
set
risk-based
remediation
standards
for
and
not
the
applicant.
See
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
Comment
does
not
directly
address
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR,
but
is
a
series
of
e-mails
between
the
commenter
and
the
RWQCB’s
project
manager
that
were
exchanged
before
release
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
References
to
the
“EIR”
in
these
e-mails
are
not
to
the
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
As
stated
by
the
RWQCB
in
the
e-mails
included
in
Comment
once
the
Baylands
EIR
is
certified
and
the
City
of
Brisbane
selects
the
land
uses
it
believes
are
appropriate,
remedial
plans
and
approaches
will
be
developed
based
on
assessment
of
risk
for
the
approved
land
uses
and
specific
exposure
scenarios.
As
further
stated
by
the
RWQCB,
until
land
uses
are
selected
by
the
City,
decisions
regarding
final
remedial
requirements
are
considered
to
be
premature.
Finally,
the
RWQCB
states
that
it
will
conduct
a
thorough
review
of
site
data
and
risk
assessment
during
the
RWQCB’s
evaluation
of
remedial
alternatives
and
subsequent
requirements.
The
information
provided
in
these
e-mails
is
consistent
with
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process
set
forth
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.9-1
May
2015