2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
2.10.18
Tony
Verreos
Verreos-1
[See page
5-618 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-1
does
not
raise
any
substantive
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Thus,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response.
[See page
5-618 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-2
does
not
raise
any
substantive
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Thus,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response.
[See page
5-618 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-3
does
not
raise
any
substantive
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Thus,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response.
[See page
5-618 for the original comment]
Draft
EIR
Section
4.C,
Biological
Resources
,
provides
a
description
of
existing
flora
and
fauna
within
the
Baylands
Project
Site.
In
addition,
Draft
EIR
Section
4.G,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials,
provides
a
description
of
existing
contamination
and
waste
characterization
within
the
Baylands.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
CEQA,
the
Draft
EIR
analyzes
the
physical
environmental
changes
that
would
result
from
implementation
of
proposed
Baylands
development.
The
Draft
EIR
does
not
attempt
to
determine
whether
existing
contamination
within
the
Baylands
Project
site
would
affect
humans
or
biological
resources
to
a
greater
degree.
As
described
in
Master Response 13,
risk-based
remediation
standards
will
be
established
by
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC
based
on
a
human
health
risk
assessment.
[See page
5-619 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-5
refers
to
the
existing
Brisbane
Soils
Processing
operations,
which
are
included
as
part
of
the
environmental
baseline
in
the
Draft
EIR.
As
described
in
Chapter
3,
Project
Description
,
this
is
an
interim
use
of
the
property
that
will
cease
with
implementation
of
proposed
remediation
and
grading
operations
within
the
former
landfill
area.
[See page
5-619 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-6
does
not
raise
any
substantive
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Thus,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response
[See page
5-619 for the original comment]
Comment
Verreos-7
does
not
raise
any
substantive
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Thus,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response
[See page
5-619 for the original comment]
The
Draft
EIR
provides
clear
visual
simulations
of
the
effects
of
proposed
site
grading
and
maximum
building
heights
on
resulting
views.
Because
currently
proposed
project
components
do
Verreos-2
Verreos-3
Verreos-4
Verreos-5
Verreos-6
Verreos-7
Verreos-8
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.18-1
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page