2.
Response
to
Comment
2.4
Master
Responses
to
Comments
Once
the
human
health
risk
assessments
have
been
prepared,
remedial
action
plans
(RAPs)
for
achieving
the
identified
cleanup
goals
will
be
prepared
by
the
DTSC
for
OU-1
and
the
RWQCB
for
OU-2.
The
RAPs
will
identify
the
specific
remedial
technologies
to
be
undertaken
to
achieve
cleanup
goals,
technical
specifications
for
those
cleanup
technologies,
and
requirements
for
monitoring
during
and
following
site
remediation.
The
State
regulatory
agencies
would
also
determine
whether
deed
restrictions
to
limit
uses
to
those
indicated
in
the
RAPs
were
warranted
based
on
the
cleanup
goals.
Because
approval
of
RAPs
for
remediation
of
OU-1
and
OU-2
require
discretionary
actions
by
the
DTSC
and
RWQCB,
their
approval
requires
environmental
review
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
CEQA.
Relationship
between
Proposed
Project
Site
Development
and
Title
27
Landfill
Closure/Site
Remediation
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-
2a
sets
forth
the
relationship
between
the
City’s
planning
review
of
land
use
within
the
Baylands
and
the
regulatory
agencies’
review
process
for
site
remediation
and
Title
27
landfill
closure.
As
discussed
in
Master Response 15,
the
key
determination
made
in
the
Draft
EIR
regarding
the
relationship
between
the
City’s
planning
review
and
the
regulatory
agencies’
remediation
review
processes
is
that,
while
sufficient
information
is
available
for
the
City
to
make
a
General
Plan/Concept
Plan
land
use
decision,
there
is
not
sufficient
information
to
support
adoption
of
a
specific
plan
at
this
time.
Thus,
EIR
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-2a
sets
forth
the
following
relationship
between
the
Ci
ty’s
planning
review
and
the
regulatory
agencies’
remediation
review
processes.
Identify
appropriate
lands
uses
within
the
Baylands
(General
Plan/Concept
Plan)
.
Following
certification
of
the
Final
EIR
for
proposed
Baylands
development,
the
City
would
determine
the
appropriate
types,
intensities,
and
location
of
lands
uses
within
the
Baylands
at
the
General
Plan/Concept
Plan
level.
Complete
plans
for
Title
27
landfill
closure
and
Remedial
Action
Plans
for
OU-1
and
OU-2
.
Based
on
the
land
uses
determined
by
the
City
to
be
appropriate
for
the
Baylands,
Remedial
Action
Plans
and
Title
27
landfill
closure
plans
would
be
completed,
submitted
to
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC.
Review
by
those
regulatory
agencies
would
then
be
undertaken
and
the
plans
revised
as
need
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC.
Prepare
and
adopt
development
regulations
for
the
Baylands
(Specific
Plan);
CEQA
documentation
.
Following
completion
of
the
Title
27
landfill
closure
and
remedial
action
plans
for
OU-1
and
OU-2,
the
City
would
consider
adoption
of
a
specific
plan
for
the
Baylands.
As
discussed
in
Master Response
1,
subsequent
environmental
documentation
under
CEQA
would
be
required
for
adoption
of
a
specific
plan
by
the
City
as
well
as
for
proposed
Title
27
landfill
closure
and
remedial
action
plans
by
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC.
Following
completion
of
CEQA
review,
the
specific
plan,
Title
27
closure
plan,
and
remediation
actions
plans
could
be
approved
by
the
City
(specific
plan),
RWQCB
(landfill
closure
and
RAP
for
OU-2),
and
DTSC
(RAP
for
OU-1).
Undertake
Title
27
landfill
closure
and
remediation
of
OU-1
and
OU-2
.
Following
completion
of
CEQA
documentation
and
approval
of
landfill
closure
and
remedial
action
plans,
physical
remediation
of
the
Baylands
would
be
undertaken.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.4-41
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page