2.
Response
to
Comment
2.4
Master
Responses
to
Comments
Home-based
work
trips.
These
represent
trips
between
home
and
work.
Baylands
development
could
generate
a
trip
end
for
this
type
of
trip
for
both
residential
and
employment
land
uses.
“Internal
capture”
of
a
home
-based
work
trip
would
occur
for
a
Baylands
resident
in
the
DSP
or
DSP-V
scenario
who
both
lives
and
works
within
the
Baylands.
Home-based
other
trips.
These
represent
trips
between
home
and
other
uses,
such
as
retail
or
school.
These
trips
would
occur
in
all
scenarios
to
the
extent
that
residents
living
outside
of
the
Baylands
in
the
CPP/CPP-V
scenarios
would
travel
to
retail
and
other
non-work
destinations
within
the
Baylands.
Non-home-based
trips.
These
represent
trips
between
any
two
uses
except
for
home,
such
as
a
trip
from
work
to
retail
or
work
to
school,
and
could
occur
in
all
scenarios.
The
internal
reductions
are
based
upon
interaction
between
land
uses
that
generate
trips,
and
the
probability
that
the
trip
might
occur
within
the
Project
Site
(i.e.,
internal
trip).
Since
the
DSP/DSP-V
scenarios
would
include
both
residential
units
and
employment-generating
land
uses,
there
would
be
the
opportunity
for
home-based
work
trips
and
home-based
other
trips
to
be
internal
to
the
Project
Site.
Since
the
CPP/CPP-V
scenarios
would
not
have
any
residential
units,
no
home-based
work
or
home-based
other
trips
could
be
internal
to
the
site.
Based
on
the
analysis
described
above,
internal
capture
reductions
for
proposed
development
within
the
Baylands
were
estimated
to
be:
Home-based
work
trips
DSP/DSP-V:
5
percent
CPP/CPP-V:
O
percent
DSP/DSP-V:
16
percent
CPP/CPP-V:
O
percent
DSP/DSP-V:
39
percent
CPP/CPP-V:
39
percent
Home-based
other
trips
Non-home-based
trips:
Thus,
the
differences
in
the
number
and
average
length
of
external
trips
between
the
DSP/DSP-V
and
CPP/CPP-V
scenarios
result
from
capture
of
home-based
trips
to
non-work
locations
and
a
modest
amount
of
home-to-work
trips
(5
percent)
within
the
Baylands.
While
many
Draft
EIR
comments
argued
that
providing
housing
within
the
Baylands
should
not
have
an
effect
on
the
average
length
of
home
to
work
trips
due
to
the
more
than
10,000
housing
units
approved
and
proposed
within
San
Francisco
to
the
north,
such
comments
did
not
account
for
the
substantial
amount
of
employment-generating
development
also
proposed
within
that
area.
As
indicated
in
Table
4.K-9
of
the
Draft
EIR,
while
Plan
Bay
Area
projects
an
increase
of
11,293
households
within
the
San
Francisco
portion
of
the
San
Francisco/San
Mateo
Bi-County
Priority
Development
Area
(PDA),
an
increase
of
9,670
jobs
is
also
projected
through
2040.
As
shown
in
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.4-73
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page