2.
Response
to
Comment
2.4
Master
Responses
to
Comments
References
Cermak,
J.E.,
“Laboratory
Simulation
of
the
Atmospheric
Boundary
Layer,”
AIAA
Journal,
vol.
9,
Sept.,
1971,
pp.
1746-54.
Cook,
N.J.,
“A
Boundary
Layer
Wind
Tunnel
For
Building
Aerodynamics,”
Journal
of
Industrial
Aerodynamics,
1975,
vol.
1,
pp.
Corrsin,
S.,
Turbulence:
Experimental
Methods,
Handbuch
Der
Physik,
Encyclopedia
of
Physics,
edited
by
S.
Flugge/Freiburg,
1963,
v.
VIII/2,
pp.
524-90.
D
avenport,
A.G.
and
N.
Isyumov,
“The
Application
of
the
Boundary
Layer
Wind
Tunnel
to
the
Prediction
of
Wind
Loading,”
in
Proceedings
of
the
International
Research
Seminar
on
Wind
Effects
on
Buildings
and
Structures,
Ottowa,
University
of
Toronto
press,
Toronto,
1968,
pp.
201-230.
J.
C.
R.
Hunt
an
H.
Fernholz,
“Wind
Tunnel
Simulation
of
the
Atmospheric
Boundary
layer:
A
Report
on
Euromech
50,”
Journal
of
Fluid
Mech.,
vol.
70,
part
3
(Aug.
1975),
pp.
543-559.
2.4.32
Master
Response
32,
Windsurfing:
Windsurfing
Area
at
the
Candlestick
Point
State
Recreation
Area
Comments
A
number
of
comments
questioned
the
sailing
area
analyzed
in
the
Draft
EIR,
asserting
that
it
did
not
accurately
reflect
the
area
actually
used
by
windsurfers
at
CPSRA
and
suggesting
that
areas
closer
in
to
the
shore
should
have
been
assessed.
Response
The
Draft
EIR
analyzed
impacts
on
an
area
of
San
Francisco
Bay
water
surface
identified
by
a
representative
of
the
San
Francisco
Boardsailing
Association
(SFBA)
to
characterize
the
primary
sailing
area.
The
SFBA’s
letter
response
to
the
Notice
of
Preparation
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR
stated
a
need
for
an
analysis
of
the
impacts
of
Baylands
development
on
the
CPSRA
windsurfing
area
but
did
not
indicate
that
the
area
closer
to
shore
was
of
concern,
although
subsequent
comment
letters
on
the
Draft
EIR
did
assert
that
areas
closer
to
shore
needed
to
be
analyzed.
The
December
2013
Draft
EIR
comment
letter
from
CPA
questions
the
sailing
area
analyzed
in
the
Draft
EIR,
suggesting
that
a
larger
area
should
have
been
analyzed.
As
stated
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.M-
5,
“the
SFBA
provided
accumulated
GPS
tracks
that
it
considers
to
be
representative
of
the
primary
sailing
area
in
this
area
of
the
Bay.”
The
information
from
the
scoping
comment
letter
was
taken
at
face
value
and
used
to
designate
the
area
analyzed
in
the
Draft
EIR,
and
was
considered
to
be
the
sailing
area
for
use
in
EIR
analyses.
In
the
wind
analysis
for
the
Draft
EIR,
a
grid
of
evenly
spaced
impact
points
was
placed
over
the
most
solid
colored
area
of
GPS
tracks
shown
in
the
image
provided
by
the
SFBA
(see
Figure
4.M-2
in
the
Draft
EIR).
While
there
were
GPS
tracks
outside
of
the
grid,
the
solid
colored
area
identified
in
Figure
4.M-2
showed
the
most
frequently
used
area
of
the
CPSRA.
This
grid
area
is
larger
and
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.4-95
May
2015