2.
Response
to
Comments
2.7
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Special
Districts
MID-3
[See page
5-43 for the original comment]
The
Notice
of
Preparation
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR
was
sent
to
MID
in
November
2012.
In
addition,
MID
was
sent
a
copy
of
the
Draft
EIR
in
June
2013.
Please
see
Response
MID-1,
above.
[See page
5-44 for the original comment]
Responses
to
the
issues
introduced
in
this
comment
are
provided
in
Master Response
1,
which
discusses
why
a
program
level
of
analysis
is
appropriate
for
at
this
stage
and
what
project-level
CEQA
review
will
be
conducted
in
the
future,
including
analysis
of
the
proposed
water
transfer.
Please
also
see
Master Response 29
for
a
discussion
of
the
environmental
effects
of
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer
discussed
in
the
Draft
EIR
and
for
an
outline
of
the
issues
to
be
re-evaluated
in
greater
detail
in
a
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
document
on
the
transfer.
[See page
5-44 for the original comment]
This
comment
discusses
the
meaning
of
“the
whole
of
an
action”
but
does
not
comment
on
the
adequacy
or
a
ccuracy
of
the
Draft
EIR.
As
such,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response.
[See page
5-45 for the original comment]
The
proposed
water
transfer
described
in
the
Draft
EIR
is
summarized
in
this
comment,
but
the
comment
does
not
raise
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
analyses
and
conclusions
contained
in
the
Draft
EIR.
As
such,
CEQA
requires
no
further
response.
Please
see
Master
Response
1
for
a
discussion
of
why
a
program
level
of
analysis
is
appropriate
at
this
stage
and
what
project-level
CEQA
review
will
be
conducted
in
the
future,
including
evaluation
of
the
proposed
water
transfer.
Please
also
see
Master Response 29
for
discussion
of
the
environmental
effects
of
the
proposed
OID
transfer
discussed
in
the
Draft
EIR
and
for
an
outline
of
the
issues
to
be
re-evaluated
in
greater
detail
in
a
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
document
on
the
transfer.
[See page
5-45 for the original comment]
Please
see
Master Response
1
for
a
discussion
of
why
a
program
level
of
analysis
is
appropriate
at
this
stage
and
what
project-level
CEQA
review
will
be
conducted
in
the
future,
including
evaluation
of
the
proposed
water
transfer.
Please
also
see
Master Response 29
for
discussion
of
the
environmental
effects
of
the
proposed
OID
transfer
discussed
in
the
Draft
EIR
and
for
an
outline
of
the
issues
to
be
re-evaluated
in
greater
detail
in
a
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
document
on
the
transfer.
[See page
5-45 for the original comment]
See
Response
MID-7.
[See page
5-45 for the original comment]
See
Response
MID-7.
[See page
5-45 for the original comment]
See
Response
MID-7.
[See
page
5-46
for
the
original
comment]
See
Response
MID-7.
MID-4
MID-5
MID-6
MID-7
MID-8
MID-9
MID-10
MID-11
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.7.2-2
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page