2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
neither
have
any
specific
tenants
for
onsite
development
been
identified
with
the
exception
of
Recology
modernization
and
expansion
in
the
CPP-V
scenario.
Because
only
the
types
of
businesses
that
would
be
permitted
under
each
scenario
are
known
at
this
time,
only
a
general
TDM
program
could
be
formulated.
When
site-specific
development
is
proposed,
a
TDM
program
would
be
developed
by
the
developer
and/or
tenants
and
subject
to
review
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
and
C/CAG.
See
Chapter
6
of
the
2013
Congestion
Management
Program
for
San
Mateo
County
(C/GAG,
2013)
[http://ccag.ca.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2014/05/2013-CMP_Final-Nov13.pdf].
As
stated
in
Comment
C/CAG
2-1,
Section
4.N,
Traffic
and
Circulation
,
is
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
San
Mateo
County
Congestion
Management
Program,
“which
requires
mitigation
measures
for
land
use
changes
and
development
projects
that
are
projected
to
significantly
impact
or
generate
more
than
100
new,
net
peak
hour
trips
on
the
CMP
roadway
network.”
2.8.3.5
San
Francisco
International
Airport
Comment
is
an
introduction
to
the
SFO
comment
letter,
and
does
not
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
it
analyses
and
conclusions.
The
Baylands
Project
Site
is
within
Airport
Influence
Area
A
–
Real
Estate
Disclosure
Area,
and
person(s)
offering
real
property
for
lease
or
sale
are
required
to
provide
an
airport
disclosure
statement,
no
physical
environmental
impacts
are
associated
with
such
disclosure
statements.
See
Final
EIR
Chapter
3.0
for
revisions
text
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.G-
101
in
relation
to
Airport
Influence
Area
A.
Noise
Impact
4.J-5
explicitly
acknowledges
that
although
the
entirety
of
the
Baylands
Site
is
outside
of
the
65
dB
noise
contour
of
San
Francisco
International
Airport,
a
substantial
number
of
noise
complaints
are
received
from
Brisbane
residents.
The
conclusion
in
the
Draft
EIR
that
airport-related
noise
impacts
would
be
less
than
significant
is
based
on
the
objective
65
CNEL
noise
standard
used
throughout
the
State
of
California.
Based
on
proposed
site
grading
and
maximum
permitted
building
heights,
no
buildings
within
the
Baylands
would
be
tall
enough
to
encroach
into
SFO
imaginary
surfaces
and
thereby
have
a
potential
effect
on
air
navigation.
Pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
CFR
Title
14
Part
77.9,
each
site-specific
development
will
be
reviewed
to
determine
whether
a
Determination
of
No
Hazard
from
the
FAA
is
required.
No
site-specific
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.3-17
May
2015