2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
also
be
required
not
to
create
any
new
exposure
pathways
that
could
adversely
affect
human
health
or
the
environment.
See
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
As
discussed
in
that
master
response,
site
remediation
and
Title
27
landfill
closure
will
consider
potential
exposure
pathways
related
to
the
former
landfill,
and
the
land
uses
determined
by
the
City
to
be
appropriate
within
the
Baylands;
and
human
health
risks
associated
with
site
contamination
in
relation
to
those
land
uses
to
develop
risk-based
cleanup
goals.
Title
27
landfill
closure
will
be
required
to
address
operation
and
maintenance
of
a
leachate
seep
collection
and
transmission
system,
as
well
as
continued
groundwater,
surface
water,
and
leachate
quality
monitoring
and
evaluation.
Monitoring
and
reporting
of
remedial
actions
at
the
former
landfill
will
occur
under
the
regulatory
authority
of
the
RWQCB,
and
not
the
City
of
Brisbane.
The
City
will
work
with
the
RWQCB
to
keep
City
residents
informed
of
remediation
activities,
monitoring,
and
results.
See
for
discussion
of
the
Title
27
landfill
closure
review
and
approval
process.
Although
the
required
remedial
actions
for
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
have
previously
been
described
in
the
Burns
&
McDonnell
2002
Final
Closure
and
Post-Closure
Maintenance
Plan,
the
regulatory
agencies
including
the
RWQCB
and
the
CalRecycle/San
Mateo
County
Health
System
will
ultimately
define
the
remediation
and
post-closure
monitoring
ensuring
both
are
in
compliance
with
Title
27
CCR
21190
and
any
new,
applicable
regulations.
See
also
1
for
discussion
of
the
programmatic
nature
of
the
Draft
EIR.
As
stated
in
that
Master
Response,
approval
of
final
remediation
and
landfill
closure
plans
will
be
subject
to
project-level
environmental
analysis
pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
CEQA.
Because
of
the
large
landfill
area
that
needs
to
be
provided
with
a
permanent
cover,
as
well
as
the
need
to
(1)
provide
adequate
drainage
within
the
site,
(2)
extend
Geneva
Avenue
from
Bayshore
Boulevard
to
the
US
101
freeway,
and
(3)
remediate
the
former
railyard,
substantial
grading
is
required,
regardless
of
the
land
uses
ultimately
approved
by
the
City
within
the
Baylands.
The
impacts
of
site
grading
and
mitigation
measures
to
avoid
or
minimize
those
impacts
are
addressed
throughout
the
Draft
EIR
as
part
of
the
analysis
of
construction
impacts
for
air
quality,
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
noise
and
traffic,
and
are
also
addressed
in
the
Aesthetics
section
in
terms
of
the
visual
effects
of
proposed
final
grades.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.1-64
May
2015