2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
BBCAG-219
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 15
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
Information
on
studies
occurring
after
2008
is
presented
in
the
Draft
EIR
on
pages
4.G-17
and
18,
4.G-30
to
33.
Information
on
contamination
in
the
2010
baseline
year
is
presented
starting
on
page
4.G-34
(see
Master Response
7
for
discussion
of
the
use
of
2010
as
the
baseline
year
for
the
Draft
EIR).
Data
are
included
in
Appendix
H
to
the
Draft
EIR,
commencing
at
page
1501.
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 15
for
discussion
regarding
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
The
tables
and
text
in
the
Draft
EIR
report
constituents
of
concern
that
exceeded
reporting
limits.
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
See
Response BBCAG-211.
Data
are
included
in
Appendix
H
to
the
Draft
EIR,
commencing
at
page
1501.
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
Because
the
land
uses
currently
proposed
for
OU-2
are
different
than
those
proposed
in
2002,
along
with
the
advances
in
technologies,
a
new
Remedial
Action
Plan
will
be
required.
The
RAP
for
OU-2
will
be
required
to
meet
current
regulatory
requirements,
as
well
as
comments
received
from
the
regulatory
agency,
recognizing
changes
in
proposed
future
land
use
and
updated
risk-based
cleanup
levels
based
on
the
land
uses
determined
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
to
be
appropriate
within
the
Baylands.
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
See
Master Response
5
for
discussion
of
compliance
with
the
law
and
applicable
regulations
as
mitigation
under
CEQA.
The
RWQCB
and
DTSC
have
the
regulatory
authority
for
enforcement
of
cleanup
actions
within
the
Project
site.
The
City
of
Brisbane
retains
land
use
authority
and
is
responsible
for
ensuring
implementation
of
each
of
the
mitigation
measures
set
forth
in
the
Brisbane
Baylands
EIR.
The
specific
methods
that
will
be
employed
to
implement
EIR
mitigation
measures,
along
with
responsibilities
for
implementation
and
enforcement
of
mitigation
measures
are
set
forth
in
the
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Plan
in
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR.
Applicants
for
the
overall
Baylands
development
and
for
site-
specific
development
within
the
Baylands
will
be
responsible
for
paying
all
costs
related
to
implementation
and
enforcement
of
EIR
mitigation
measures.
[See page
5-135 for the original comment]
Per
CEQA
Guidelines,
the
Baylands
EIR
evaluates
changes
in
the
environment
that
would
result
from
approval
of
the
proposed
project
as
it
is
described
in
Chapter
3,
Project
Description
,
including
each
of
the
four
development
scenarios
described
in
that
section
of
the
Draft
EIR.
The
section
of
the
Draft
EIR
cited
in
this
comment
(page
4.G-86,
Impact
4.G-1
“Project
Site
construction
activities
for
each
of
the
four
development
scenarios
BBCAG-220
BBCAG-221
BBCAG-222
BBCAG-223
BBCAG-224
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.1-72
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page