2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
would
not
be
permitted
within
the
footprint
of
the
former
landfill,
nor
would
it
be
permitted
elsewhere
within
the
Baylands
in
locations
where
percolation
could
cause
leachate
or
soils
contaminants
to
enter
groundwater.
The
proposed
development
will
be
required
to
employ
the
best
management
practices
to
comply
with
applicable
stormwater
regulations
that
best
fit
the
site-
specific
characteristics
of
the
Baylands,
as
well
as
the
land
uses
determined
by
the
City
to
be
appropriate
for
the
Baylands.
BBCAG-266
[See page
5-143 for the original comment]
See
Master Response
5
for
discussion
of
compliance
with
the
law
as
mitigation
under
CEQA.
Implementation
of
the
General
Permit
for
Discharges,
NPDES
General
Construction
Permits,
and
Regional
Stormwater
Permits
address
erosion
control
and
quality
of
runoff
water,
and
will
be
implemented
in
post-remediation
conditions.
All
grading,
construction,
and
infrastructure
development
will
be
required
to
be
consistent
with
RWQCB
and
DTSC
requirements
set
as
part
of
those
agencies’
remediation
review
and
approval
processes.
[See page
5-143 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
regarding
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process
and
Master Response 15
for
discussion
regarding
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
[See page
5-144 for the original comment]
The
proposed
remedial
action
for
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
will
address
provision
of
a
low
permeability
engineered
landfill
cap
compliant
with
Title
27
and
requirements
to
prevent
any
increases
in
leachate
that
exceed
any
regulatory
thresholds.
As
required
by
Title
27
CCR
21190,
long-term
maintenance
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
final
cover
system
of
the
former
landfill
will
be
provided.
[See page
5-145 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
regarding
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process
for
the
Baylands
and
Master Response
1
for
discussion
regarding
the
programmatic
nature
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
EIR.
[See page
5-145 for the original comment]
RWQCB
Order
No.
01-041
is
cited
in
the
references
for
Section
4.G,
and
is
available
for
review
as
part
of
the
Draft
EIR’s
references
at
the
Brisbane
Community
Development
Department,
50
Park
Place,
Brisbane,
CA.
The
fourth
paragraph
on
page
4.G-23
is
revised
to
add
the
following
footnote.
Following
closure
of
the
landfill,
the
area
was
subsequently
buried
with
a
20-
to
30-foot
cover
of
soil
to
prevent
future
direct
human
contact
with
refuse.
As
part
of
Title
27
landfill
closure
requirements
and
RWQCB
BBCAG-267
BBCAG-268
BBCAG-269
BBCAG-270
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.1-90
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page