2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
For
informational
purposes,
emergency
management,
including
preparedness
and
activities
during
public
emergencies
is
the
responsibility
of
the
City’s
Office
of
Emergency
Services.
The
City’s
Emergency
Operations
Plan
(EOP)
defines
preparedness
and
incident
management
activities,
and
describes
organizational
structures,
roles
and
responsibilities,
policies,
and
protocols
for
providing
emergency
support.
The
EOP
is
designed
to
be
consistent
with
Homeland
Security
Presidential
Directive
(HSPS-5),
the
National
Incident
Management
System
(NIMS),
the
California
Standardized
Emergency
Management
System
(SEMS),
and
Incident
Command
System
(ICS)
requirements.
See:
Whether
residential
uses
should
or
should
not
be
approved
as
proposed
in
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
will
be
determined
by
the
Brisbane
City
Council
following
completion
of
the
CEQA
and
planning
review
processes
being
undertaken
by
the
City.
As
discussed
human
health
risk
assessments
and
risk-based
cleanup
goals
will
be
prepared
based
on
the
land
uses
approved
by
the
City
of
Brisbane.
The
human
health
risk
assessments
will
provide
risk-based
cleanup
goals
that
are
protective
of
human
health
and
the
environment.
Based
on
risk-based
cleanup
goals,
the
specific
technologies
to
be
employed
in
sire
remediation
and
landfill
closure
will
be
determined,
and
approved,
by
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC.
Noise
levels
from
the
US
101
freeway,
Caltrain,
Bayshore
Boulevard,
and
aircraft
from
San
Francisco
International
Airport
are
addressed
in
Section
4.J,
Noise
,
of
the
Draft
EIR.
As
discussed
in
that
section,
noise
impacts
will
be
mitigated
to
less
than
significant
levels
with
the
exception
of
construction
noise.
Project
construction
activities
would
result
in
substantial
temporary
or
periodic
increases
in
ambient
noise
levels
within
the
Project
Site
above
levels
that
would
exist
without
the
Project,
even
with
implementation
of
all
feasible
mitigation.
There
is
no
scientific
evidence
to
substantiate
the
assertion
that
climate
change
will
redirect
prevailing
winds
and
thereby
deteriorate
area
air
quality.
While
some
industrial
uses,
such
as
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm
and
Recology,
will
remain,
the
existing
Bayshore
Industrial
Park
will
be
removed
as
part
of
proposed
Baylands
development
under
all
four
development
scenarios.
An
air
pollutant
health
risk
assessment
undertaken
for
proposed
Baylands
development
did
not
indicate
any
significant
impacts.
The
comment
does
not
address
the
Draft
EIR
’s
analysis
or
conclusions,
but
rather
is
directed
to
the
Draft
EIR
Appendix
B,
Brisbane
Baylands
Infrastructure
Plan
section
discussing
possible
secondary
water
supply
sources
for
the
Project
Site
development.
As
stated
in
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.1-102
May
2015