2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
Baylands
will
be
required
to
be
compatible
with
the
City’s
existing
water
system
and
to
meet
all
City
design
requirements.
BBCAG-307
[See page
5-151 for the original comment]
As
discussed
in
Responses
BBCAG-301
and
302,
design
plans
for
water
and
wastewater
systems
will
be
required
to
be
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
(water
and
wastewater
systems)
and
Bayshore
Sanitary
District
(wastewater
system).
Standard
design
features
to
control
leakage
and
other
potential
structural
breakdowns
would
be
required
prior
to
issuance
of
any
construction
permits.
It
is
also
noted
that
Figure
7.4
in
the
proposed
Brisbane
Baylands
Specific
Plan
Infrastructure
Plan
prepared
by
the
applicant
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
illustrates
a
cross
section
of
a
manhole
leak
detection
system
for
water
valves.
[See page
5-151 for the original comment]
The
Draft
EIR
is
a
program
document,
which,
as
explained
in
Master Response
1,
and
in
Section
1.1
of
the
Draft
EIR,
provides
for
disclosure
of
physical
environmental
impacts
and
feasible
mitigation
measures
for
proposed
Baylands
development
to
(1)
facilitate
the
Ci
ty’s
ability
to
determine
appropriate
types
and
intensity
of
land
use
within
the
Baylands,
and
(2)
take
appropriate
actions
in
relation
to
the
various
components
of
the
Baylands
development
program
described
in
Chapter
3,
Project
Description
.
See
Master Response
1
for
discussion
regarding
the
appropriate
level
of
detail
provided
in
the
Program
EIR
and
Master Response
4
for
a
description
of
the
planning
review
process
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
and
the
relation
of
the
planning
review
process
to
the
CEQA
review
process.
[See page
5-152 for the original comment]
As
discussed
in
Draft
EIR
Chapter
3.0,
Project
Description
,
the
proposed
project
analyzed
in
the
Draft
EIR
is
selection
of
a
concept
plan
scenario
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands,
a
General
Plan
Amendment,
and
(if
either
the
DSP
or
DSP-V
scenario
is
selected),
a
specific
plan,
as
well
as
site
remediation
and
a
proposed
water
supply
agreement.
The
project
description
being
analyzed
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
does
not
entail
approval
of
infrastructure
systems
for
future
development.
See
Master Response
1
for
discussion
regarding
the
appropriate
level
of
detail
provided
in
the
Program
EIR
and
Master Response
4
for
a
description
of
the
planning
review
process
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
and
the
relation
of
the
planning
review
process
to
the
CEQA
review
process.
[See page
5-152 for the original comment]
This
comment
addresses
the
infrastructure
plan
set
forth
in
the
proposed
Brisbane
Baylands
Specific
Plan
prepared
by
the
applicant
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios;
it
does
not
address
the
EIR
or
the
adequacy
of
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Drainage
plan
details
such
as
locations
and
sizes
of
drainage
areas
for
bioswales
would
be
included
in
stormwater
management
plans
required
for
approvals
of
BBCAG-308
BBCAG-309
BBCAG-310
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.1-104
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page