Mitigation Measure 4.C-4e is revised to read as follows:

During design of any building greater than 100 feet tall, the applicant and architect shall consult with a qualified biologist experienced with urban building bird strikes design issues (as approved by the City of Brisbane Planning Department) to identify measures related to the external appearance of the building to minimize the risk of bird strikes. Such measures, which may include the following and/or other measures, shall reflect most current practice in in bird strike protection, and be incorporated into the building’s design:

Future site-specific development proposals involving discretionary actions would also be subject to appropriate environmental review. Consistent with CEQA, the City, as lead agency, would be required to consult with trustee agencies with resources affected by the project and other state, federal, and local agencies which have jurisdiction by law or exercise authority over resources which may be affected by the project. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15086(a)(2), (3).) Depending on the future development proposal, this may require consultation with various agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and/or the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). Organizations, such as Audubon Society, may file written requests for notices of preparation of EIRs. (Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(c)(2)(D).)

BCC-145

[See page 5-192 for the original comment] Mitigation Measures to address noise impacts are provided in Section 4.J, Noise and Vibration, and include Mitigation Measures 4.J-1a, 4.J-1b, 4.J-3a, 4.J-4a, and 4.J-4b.

Previous Page | Next Page