2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
In
general,
these
efforts
have
recognized
that
many
petroleum
release
cases
pose
a
low
threat
to
human
health
and
the
environment
(SWRCB
2012).
BCC-233
[See page
5-210 for the original comment]
Title
5,
California
Code
of
Regulations
Division
1,
Chapter
13,
Subchapter
1,
School
Facilities
Construction,
Article
2
School
Site
Selection
§14010
Standards
for
School
Site
Selection
states
,
All
Districts
shall
select
a
school
site
that
provides
safety
and
that
supports
learning.
The
following
standards
shall
apply:
d.
If
the
proposed
site
is
within
1,500
feet
of
a
railroad
track
easement,
a
safety
study
shall
be
done
by
a
competent
professional
trained
in
assessing
cargo
manifests,
frequency,
speed,
and
schedule
of
railroad
traffic,
grade,
curves,
type
and
condition
of
track
need
for
sound
or
safety
barriers,
need
for
pedestrian
and
vehicle
safeguards
at
railroad
crossings,
presence
of
high
pressure
gas
lines
near
the
tracks
that
could
rupture
in
the
event
of
a
derailment,
preparation
of
an
evacuation
plan.
In
addition
to
the
analysis,
possible
and
reasonable
mitigation
measures
must
be
identified.
The
site
shall
not
be
located
near
an
above-ground
water
or
fuel
storage
tank
or
within
1500
feet
of
the
easement
of
an
above
ground
or
underground
pipeline
that
can
pose
a
safety
hazard
as
determined
by
a
risk
analysis
study,
conducted
by
a
competent
professional,
which
may
include
certification
from
a
local
public
utility
commission.”
h.
Thus,
Title
5
does
not
impose
a
prohibition
against
location
of
a
high
school
within
¼
mile
of
the
Kinder
Morgan
Tank
Farm,
unless
it
is
determined
through
preparation
of
a
“risk
analysis
study,
conducted
by
a
competent
professional,
which
may
include
certification
from
a
local
public
utility
commission”
that
the
tank
farm
poses
a
safety
hazard
to
the
proposed
school.
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-3
(page
4.G-100)
states
a
grade
K-12
school
shall
not
be
constructed
within
¼
miles
of
a
facility
that
handles
hazardous
or
acutely
hazardous
materials,
substances
or
waste,
unless
approved
by
School
Facilities
Planning
Division
of
the
California
Department
of
Education
in
conformance
with
the
above
cited
Title
5
requirements.
Should
the
required
risk
analysis
study
determine
that
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm
pose
a
safety
hazard
to
the
high
school,
the
school
would
not
be
permitted
to
be
constructed
at
that
location.
BCC-234
[See page
5-210 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 15
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
Master Response 13
for
discussion
regarding
the
Title
27
landfill
closure
review
and
approval
process.
Final
remedial
actions
at
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
will
be
defined
and
approved
by
the
RWQCB
and
CalRecycle/San
Mateo
County
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-87
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page