2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
See
See
also
for
discussion
of
the
cumulative
effects
of
multiple
toxins.
See
See
See
See
See
This
comment
refers
to
previously
proposed
risk-based
cleanup
levels
proposed
by
MACTEC
for
in
2009.
See
13
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
Based
on
the
land
uses
approved
by
the
City
of
Brisbane,
updated
human
health
risk
assessments
will
be
prepared.
These
human
health
risk
assessments
will
then
be
used
by
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC
to
set
site-specific
risk-
based
cleanup
goals
for
the
Baylands.
See
See
See
This
comment
mischaracterizes
the
recommendations
of
the
Draft
EIR.
See
for
discussion
of
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
Pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
Draft
EIR
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-2a,
site
remediation
and
landfill
closure
will
be
required
to
meet
the
standards
set
by
the
RWQCB
and
DTSC,
which
are
the
state
agencies
having
regulatory
authority
over
remediation
and
landfill
closure
within
the
Baylands.
See
also
5
for
discussion
of
compliance
with
the
law
as
mitigation
under
CEQA.
See
This
comment
references
unidentified
evidence
regarding
the
effects
of
testing;
however,
no
documentation
is
provided
to
identify
a
cause
and
effect
relationship
between
groundwater
testing
and
the
movement
of
contaminants.
See
15
for
discussion
regarding
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
As
part
of
site
remediation
and
Title
27
landfill
closure,
the
RWQCB
will
require
remediation
of
existing
groundwater
contamination.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-91
May
2015