2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
See
See
also
for
discussion
of
the
proposed
development
analyzed
as
part
of
cumulative
conditions.
The
Visitacion
Valley
Redevelopment
Mixed
Use
Project
(Schlage
Lock
site)
is
listed
as
Project
#10
in
Table
6-2,
Cumulative
Projects,
in
Chapter
6.0
Significant
Unavoidable
Impacts,
Growth
Inducement,
Cumulative
Impacts,
and
Other
CEQA
Considerations.
Therefore,
this
project
has
been
considered
in
the
cumulative
analysis
for
development
of
the
Baylands.
As
noted
in
Chapter
6.0,
the
cumulative
analyses
for
air
quality,
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
and
traffic
rely
on
projections
contained
in
adopted
local,
regional,
or
statewide
plan
or
related
planning
documents.
Cumulative
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions
are
discussed
on
page
6-25
and
Section
4.F
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions
,
of
the
Draft
EIR.
The
has
EIR
concluded
that
because
GHG
emissions
would
be
below
the
Bay
Area
Air
Quality
Management
District’s
(BAAQMD)
“efficiency
threshold,”
all
four
development
scenarios
would
not
make
a
substantial
contribution
to
cumulative
GHG
impacts.
Cumulative
traffic
impacts
are
discussed
on
page
6-44
and
in
Section
4.N,
Traffic
and
Circulation
,
Impact
4.N-3
and
Impact
4.N-4.
As
discussed,
roadway
level
of
service
standards
would
be
exceeded,
and
significant
cumulative
impacts
would
result
under
Cumulative
without
Project
conditions.
The
addition
of
project
site
development-related
traffic
is
cumulatively
considerable
due
to
the
large
amount
of
traffic
that
would
be
generated
by
each
Project
Site
development
scenario,
as
demonstrated
in
Section
4.N.
The
potential
handling
and
storage
of
hazardous
materials
by
proposed
uses
within
the
Baylands
is
addressed
in
Section
4.G,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials
.
See
for
a
discussion
of
land
use
compatibility
in
relation
to
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm.
All
infrastructure
needed
to
support
Baylands
development
that
is
to
be
maintained
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
will
be
constructed
to
the
most
current
City
standards
in
effect
at
the
time
infrastructure
improvements
are
constructed.
Infrastructure
that
will
be
maintained
by
other
agencies
(e.g.,
San
Francisco
PUC,
Bayshore
Sanitary
District)
will
be
constructed
to
the
standards
of
those
agencies.
All
structure
to
be
built
within
the
Baylands
will
be
required
to
meet
the
City’s
most
current
building
standards
at
the
time
building
permits
are
issued.
The
“Community
Prepared
Plan”
(CPP)
scenario
was
developed
through
extensive
community
input,
including
a
series
of
public
meetings
that
focused
on
the
types
and
distribution
of
developed
land
and
open
space
uses
rather
than
on
proposed
development
intensity.
The
development
intensity
was
established
to
allow
for
a
worst-case
analysis
of
potential
environmental
impacts.
The
CPP
scenario
was
designated
for
study
in
this
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-110
May
2015