2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
adverse
impacts
of
too
rapid
growth.”
Table
4.I-1
notes
that
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
are
inconsistent
with
this
policy
since
the
proposed
Brisbane
Baylands
Specific
Plan
“does
not
tie
the
rate
of
land
development
to
the
availability
of
infrastructure,
which
could
lead
to
the
establishment
of
new
uses
outstripping
the
capacity
of
infrastructure
during
initial
phases
of
development
prior
to
project
buildout.”
Unless
the
City
modifies
or
removes
Policy
337
from
the
General
Plan,
any
specific
plan
approved
within
the
Baylands
will
be
required
to
establish
requirements
and
performance
standards
tying
the
pace
of
land
development
to
the
availability
of
services,
facilities,
and
infrastructure,
including
the
roadway
and
interchange
improvements
related
to
the
Bi-County
Program
pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
Draft
EIR
Mitigation
Measure
4.I-1.
For
discussion
of
the
future
developments
included
in
the
analysis
of
cumulative
traffic
conditions
in
the
Draft
EIR,
see
As
stated
the
traffic
analysis
undertaken
for
the
Baylands
includes
specific
traffic
generation
information
for
the
following
projects:
Visitacion
Valley
Redevelopment
Program
(Schlage
Lock)
Executive
Park
Development
Plan
Candlestick
Point/Hunters
Point
Shipyard
India
Basin
Shoreline
Daly
City
Cow
Palace
Because
the
traffic
analyses
for
these
projects
were
prepared
at
different
times,
earlier
analyses
do
not
include
traffic
generation
for
subsequently
proposed
projects.
Thus,
a
“concurrent
and
detailed
analysis/comparison
of
traffic
studies
from
all
developers
in
the
Bi-County”
area
would
not
provide
useful
information
regarding
the
impacts
of
the
Baylands
development
on
traffic.
With
regard
to
a
comparison
of
mitigation
measures
from
developments
in
the
bi-county
area,
the
Draft
EIR
assumes
the
construction
of
the
roadway
improvements
required
as
mitigation
measures
for
the
projects
cited
above
concurrent
with
buildout
of
those
projects.
Also,
as
noted
on
page
4.N-29-31
of
the
Draft
EIR,
the
Bi-County
Study
provides
a
framework
through
which
funding
and
fair-share
allocations
for
transportation
improvements
in
the
northeast
section
of
San
Mateo
County
and
southeast
section
of
San
Francisco
County
would
be
allocated
to
specific
development
proposals.
The
comment
refers
to
an
“unacceptable
and
irreversible
unmitigable
impact”
which
is
not
a
CEQA
standard
of
significance.
The
Draft
EIR
did
find
significant
and
unavoidable
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-152
May
2015