2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
analysis.
See
Master Response 22
and
Response
BCC-584
regarding
use
of
the
SF-CHAMP
model.
BCC-586
[See page
5-271 for the original comment]
The
proposed
roadway
network
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
was
based
on
the
proposed
Brisbane
Baylands
Specific
Plan
prepared
by
the
applicant
for
those
scenarios.
The
roadway
network
prepared
for
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
did
not
include
the
northerly
extension
of
Sierra
Point
Parkway
from
Lagoon
Road
to
the
proposed
Geneva
Avenue
extension,
and
it
was
therefore
not
included
in
the
Draft
EIR’s
impact
analysis.
The
City
will
consider
the
appropriateness
of
the
frontage
road
and
whether
it
should
be
included
in
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
as
part
of
its
planning
review
and
decisionmaking
for
the
Baylands.
See
Master Response
4
for
more
information
on
the
relative
roles
of
the
CEQA
and
planning
review
processes.
[See page
5-271 for the original comment]
Figure
4.N-13,
CPP
Conceptual
Road
Network
Improvements,
has
been
revised
to
include
Beatty
Avenue.
[See page
5-271 for the original comment]
The
comment
lacks
a
factual
basis
to
support
the
assertion
that
peak
hour
backups
onto
the
Tunnel
Avenue
Bridge
will
result.
The
traffic
analysis
undertaken
for
the
Draft
EIR
indicated
that
reconfiguration
of
the
intersection
of
Tunnel
Avenue
and
Lagoon
Road
would
not
substantially
alter
travel
patterns
to
the
Baylands
site.
Under
both
No
Project
and
With
Project
conditions,
the
intersection
is
a
3-way
stop
sign
controlled
intersection
and
would
not
substantially
change
intersection
operations.
Delay
due
to
increased
traffic
and
congestion
at
Old
County
Road/Bayshore
Boulevard
is
presented
in
the
Draft
EIR
in
Tables
4.N-25
and
4.N-26
(pages
4.N-91
to
4.N-94)
for
existing
conditions
and
Tables
4.N-31
and
4.N-32
(pages
4.N-110
to
and
4.N-113)
for
cumulative
conditions.
Any
proposal
to
terminate
Tunnel
Avenue
in
a
T-intersection
at
Lagoon
Road
would
be
subject
to
its
own
environmental
review.
BCC-589
[See page
5-271 for the original comment]
The
DSP
scenario
provides
for
access
to
Bayshore
Boulevard
from
the
Baylands
Project
Site
along
Tunnel
Avenue
via
Roundhouse
Arc
north
of
Icehouse
Hill.
The
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
do
not
permit
this
access
due
to
the
planned
open
space
within
that
area.
Because
the
exact
internal
network
configurations
are
not
confirmed,
the
trip
assignment
uses
only
the
major
access
points
to
the
Baylands
Project
Site,
providing
a
conservative
estimate
for
traffic
impacts
at
the
access
points.
As
discussed
in
Master Response
1,
the
Baylands
EIR
provides
program-level
analyses
and
review
of
the
most
appropriate
termination
point
for
Tunnel
Avenue,
as
well
as
the
desirability
of
egress
north
of
Icehouse
Hill
will
be
BCC-587
BCC-588
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-161
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page