2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
The
proposed
mitigation
to
maintain
acceptable
operations
during
an
event
is
that
the
arena
operator
shall
develop
and
implement
a
Transportation
Management
Plan
(TMP)
for
coordination
with
the
San
Francisco
Municipal
Transportation
Agency
(SFMTA),
the
San
Francisco
Police
Department,
and
the
City
of
Brisbane,
developing
incentives
to
increase
transit
ridership
to
the
arena,
and
deploying
traffic
control
officers
at
the
unsignalized
intersection
of
Blanken
Avenue
and
Tunnel
Avenue
to
approximate
traffic
control
with
traffic
signals
of
LOS
C.
Impacts
of
sold
out
events
were
determined
to
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
The
comment
is
not
relevant
to
the
cited
Section
of
the
Draft
EIR.
Table
4.N-19
identifies
projected
loading
demands
for
proposed
development
within
the
Baylands,
not
truck
trips,
as
is
asserted
in
Comment
The
effect
of
trucks
on
roadway
operations
is
included
in
the
operations
analysis,
and
is
represented
by
a
percentage
of
roadway
volume.
The
proposed
development
being
analyzed
includes
concept
plan
and
General
Plan
level
information
for
all
four
scenarios
and
specific
plan
level
information
regarding
development
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios.
No
site-specific
development
projects
have
been
proposed,
neither
have
any
specific
tenants
for
onsite
development
been
identified
with
the
exception
of
Recology
modernization
and
expansion
in
the
CPP-V
scenario.
Because
the
types
of
businesses
that
would
be
permitted
under
each
scenario
are
known,
reasonable
assumptions
regarding
the
truck
loading
demands
for
these
types
of
businesses
were
evaluated.
The
City
of
Brisbane
has
not
adopted
standards
for
the
number
of
loading
docks
that
would
be
required
for
non-residential
development.
Instead,
the
City
analyzes
site-specific
development
on
a
case-by-case
basis
to
determine
the
required
number
of
loading
docks
a
development
needs.
The
City
will
undertake
site-specific
analysis
of
loading
dock
requirements
at
such
time
as
site-specific
projects
are
proposed.
To
analyze
potential
impacts
related
to
loading
areas,
data
compiled
for
use
in
San
Francisco
was
used.
Such
data
can
reasonably
be
applied
to
the
Brisbane
Baylands
since
the
site
is
located
directly
adjacent
to
San
Francisco
and
there
are
no
physical
features
that
separate
the
Brisbane
Baylands
from
adjacent
lands
within
San
Francisco,
and
Brisbane
and
adjacent
lands
in
San
Francisco
share
roadway.
The
density
and
design
of
the
proposed
Brisbane
Baylands
development
is
similar
to
much
of
the
new
development
in
San
Francisco,
therefore
it
is
expected
that
loading
demand
would
also
be
similar.
Loading
demand
identified
in
the
Draft
EIR
is
calculated
based
on
land
uses
that
are
also
present
in
San
Francisco,
such
as
residences,
retail,
and
office.
Table
4.N-19
forecasts
the
number
of
loading
spaces
needed
at
the
Baylands
Project
Site.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-175
May
2015