2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
As
stated
under
the
conclusion
on
page
4.N-97,
with
implementation
of
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-1b,
the
intersection
of
Old
County
Road
at
Bayshore
Boulevard
would
improve
to
improve
intersection
operations
under
Existing
plus
Project
conditions
only
in
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
to
an
acceptable
LOS
C
during
both
AM
and
PM
peak
hours.
No
feasible
mitigation
is
available
to
achieve
LOS
C
for
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios.
As
shown
in
Table
4.N-29,
traffic
generated
from
outside
the
Baylands
will
cause
intersection
levels
of
service
to
deteriorate
to
LOS
D
without
the
proposed
Geneva
Avenue
extension,
even
if
no
development
occurs
within
the
Baylands.
Thus,
Brisbane’s
General
Plan
level
of
service
standards
cannot
be
achieved
even
if
no
development
were
to
occur
within
the
Baylands
.
If
the
Geneva
Avenue
extension
is
not
constructed,
traffic
generated
by
development
in
Daly
City
and
San
Francisco
will
cause
the
level
of
service
at
the
intersection
of
Old
County
Road
at
Bayshore
Boulevard
to
deteriorate
to
an
unacceptable
LOS
D,
even
if
no
development
occurs
within
the
Baylands.
If
the
Geneva
Avenue
extension
is
constructed,
traffic
generated
by
development
in
Daly
City
and
San
Francisco
will
cause
the
level
of
service
at
the
intersection
of
Geneva
Avenue
at
Bayshore
Boulevard
to
deteriorate
to
an
unacceptable
LOS
E,
even
if
no
development
occurs
within
the
Baylands.
As
stated
in
Response
due
to
continued
generation
of
traffic
in
Daly
City
and
San
Francisco,
Brisbane’s
General
Plan
level
of
service
standards
cannot
be
achieved
even
if
no
development
were
to
occur
within
the
Baylands
.
The
comment
restates
the
Draft
EIR’s
conclusion
that
each
of
the
development
scenarios
is
inconsistent
with
the
Brisbane
General
Plan
because
they
result
in
levels
of
service
in
excess
of
General
Plan
standards.
The
comment
does
not,
therefore,
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
As
part
of
the
City’s
planning
review
and
decision
making,
necessary
measures
to
maintain
General
Plan
level
of
service
standards
will
be
evaluated.
Approval,
modification,
or
denial
of
proposed
Baylands
development
will
ultimately
be
decided
by
the
Brisbane
City
Council
based
on
information
provided
in
the
EIR
and
the
City’s
planning
review
being
undertaken
in
addition
to
CEQA
review.
See
4
for
discussion
of
the
relationship
between
the
environmental
analysis
provided
in
the
EIR
and
the
various
planning
review
activities
the
City
will
undertake
before
making
a
decision
regarding
proposed
Baylands
development.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-181
May
2015