2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
assertions
or
recommendation
as
to
whether
any
particular
development
scenario
or
alternative
should
be
approved,
modified
(other
than
required
mitigation
measures),
or
not
approved.
See
Master Response
4
for
discussion
of
the
relationship
between
the
CEQA
review
and
planning
review
being
undertaken
for
the
Baylands.
Determinations
as
to
whether
any
particular
development
scenario
or
alternative
should
be
approved,
modified,
or
not
approved
is
part
of
the
City’s
planning
review
and
not
its
environmental
review.
BCC-711
BCC-712
BCC-713
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
See
Response BCC-662.
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
See
Response BCC-648.
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
As
stated
in
the
conclusion
for
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-5
on
page
4.N-129,
even
with
implementation
of
the
mitigation
measure,
impacts
on
the
study
roadway
network
during
a
sold-out
event
at
the
arena
would
be
significant
and
unavoidable.
The
Draft
EIR
evaluates
the
environmental
impacts
of
each
of
the
four
development
scenarios,
but
makes
no
assertions
as
to
whether
any
particular
development
scenario
or
alternative
is
“appropriate.”
BCC-714
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
Trips
generated
by
local
and
regional
development
are
included
in
the
baseline
Cumulative
Conditions.
See
Master Response 22
for
information
on
cumulative
conditions.
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
As
shown
on
Tables
4.N-36,
4.N-37,
4.N-38,
and
4.N-39,
the
increase
in
regional
transit
due
to
Project
Site
development
would
be
less
than
2
percent
of
the
forecasted
transit
demand.
The
Draft
EIR
evaluates
the
transit
impacts
for
future
development
in
San
Francisco
through
the
SF-CHAMP
model,
and
was
supplemented
with
the
projects
included
in
the
cumulative
analysis
cited
in
Master Response 22.
The
combined
demand
from
local
and
regional
developments
is
taken
into
consideration
for
Cumulative
conditions.
[See page
5-285 for the original comment]
The
transportation
analysis
in
the
Draft
EIR
provides
analysis
using
the
best
available
information
during
the
environmental
review
process.
The
2010
San
Francisco
transit
screenlines
shown
in
Table
4.N-40
are
the
most
recent
available
information
of
projected
future
transit
usage
in
San
Francisco
across
the
screenlines,
and
also
correlate
with
the
identification
of
existing
conditions
in
the
2010
baseline
year.
[See page
5-286 for the original comment]
See
Response
BCC-715.
[See page
5-286 for the original comment]
The
combined
demand
from
local
and
regional
developments
is
taken
into
consideration
for
cumulative
conditions.
BCC-715
BCC-716
BCC-717
BCC-718
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-198
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page