2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
proposed
in
the
CPP
or
CPP-V
scenario,
information
on
dwelling
units
per
acre
was
not
presented
in
Table
Also,
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
set
requirements
for
maximum
building
heights,
not
number
of
stories.
Information
regarding
the
maximum
number
of
stories
permitted
for
buildings
in
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios
was
not
developed,
and
was
therefore
not
presented
in
Table
as
it
was
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios
in
Table
Section
4.L,
Public
Services
,
notes
that
because
state
law
permits
parents
to
register
their
children
for
school
based
on
either
their
place
of
residence
or
their
place
of
employment,
non-residential
development
can,
in
fact,
generate
new
students
to
a
school
district.
As
discussed
on
page
4.L-27,
“considering
the
declining
enrollment
and
the
excess
capacity
currently
available
in
JUHSD
schools,
it
is
likely
that
students
generated
by
the
CPP
or
CPP-V
scenario
would
not
result
in
the
need
for
new
or
expanded
high
school
facilities
beyond
what
is
already
underway
and
planned
within
the
JUHSD
(see
Table
4.L-2).”
Although
a
new
high
school
facility
would
not
be
required
under
the
CPP
and
CPP-V
scenarios,
a
site
for
a
charter
high
school
was
nevertheless
included
in
the
land
use
plan
for
those
scenarios.
The
relevant
CEQA
threshold
of
significance
related
to
schools
addresses
whether
a
proposed
project
would
“emit
hazardous
emissions
or
handle
hazardous
or
acutely
hazardous
materials,
substances
or
waste
within
0.25
mile
of
an
existing
or
proposed
school.”
The
Draft
EIR
addresses
this
issue
in
Section
4.G.
As
noted
in
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-3
on
page
4.G-100,
California
Code
of
Regulations
(CCR)
Title
5,
Section
14010
sets
forth
California
Department
of
Education
criteria
for
school
site
locations.
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-3
also
requires
that
Grade
K-12
school
facilities
comply
with
California
Education
Code
Sections
17210
-
17224
and
related
statutory
provisions
related
to
risk
to
human
health
or
the
environment
at
proposed
school
properties
as
overseen
by
the
Department
of
Toxic
Substances
Control
(DTSC).
Final
design
plans
for
schools
are
required
to
be
approved
by
the
School
Facilities
Planning
Division
of
the
California
Department
of
Education
prior
to
commencement
of
construction.
In
addition,
all
required
remediation
within
0.25
miles
of
a
proposed
K-12
school
site
within
the
Project
Site
is
required
to
be
completed
prior
to
occupancy
of
the
school.
Impacts
related
to
toxic
air
contaminants,
including
the
release
of
diesel
particulate
matter
from
construction
truck
trips
and/or
delivery
truck
trips
(when
the
haul
routes
are
located
within
one-quarter
mile
of
an
existing
or
proposed
school)
are
identified
in
Section
4.B,
Air
Quality
.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-14
May
2015