2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
implemented
at
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
ultimately
will
be
defined
by
the
RWQCB,
CalRecycle/San
Mateo
County
Department
of
Health
Services,
and
the
City
of
Brisbane
within
the
Final
Closure
and
Post-closure
Plans
and
would
be
influenced
by
the
nature
of
the
proposed
development.
These
Final
Closure
and
Post-closure
Plans
would
include
operation
and
maintenance
of
a
landfill
gas
collection
and
monitoring
system.
Operators
of
this
system
would
need
to
obtain
a
permit
from
the
BAAQMD.
Consistent
with
the
requirements
of
its
Policy
and
Procedure
Manual,
the
BAAQMD
would
deny
an
Authority
to
Construct
or
a
Permit
to
Operate
for
any
new
or
modified
source
of
TACs
that
exceeds
a
cancer
risk
of
10
in
one
million
or
a
chronic
or
acute
hazard
index
of
1.0.
Consequently,
implementation
of
Project
Site
development
would
have
a
beneficial
impact
on
landfill
emissions
by
upgrading
the
existing
landfill
gas
collection
system,
which
has
an
existing
excess
cancer
risk
of
54
in
one
million,
with
an
updated
system
that
would
have
an
excess
cancer
risk
of
10
in
one
million
or
less.
OSEC-81
[See page
5-314 for the original comment]
Page
4.B-34
of
the
Draft
EIR
addresses
the
impact
of
construction
emissions
on
existing
off-site
residents
and
school
children
as
well
as
proposed
on-site
residents
on
the
west
side
of
the
Baylands
site
that
could
be
occupied
during
construction
of
the
east
side
of
the
Baylands
site.
The
vehicle
trip
numbers
cited
in
this
comment
are
daily
vehicle
trip
generation
estimates
from
the
Transportation
analysis,
and
are
used
in
the
assessment
of
operational
air
quality
impacts
of
Project
Site
development
scenarios.
Please
refer
to
Draft
EIR
pages
4.N-71
through
4.N-78
for
the
methodology
behind
the
derivation
of
the
trip
generation
numbers.
The
trip
generation
numbers
cited
in
the
comment
and
on
page
4.B-34
of
the
Draft
EIR
(44,985
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
DSP
scenario,
42,446
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
DSP-V
scenario,
82,176
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
CPP
scenario,
and
79,196
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
CPP-V
scenario)
are
from
an
earlier
iteration
of
the
Transportation
analysis.
The
estimates
cited
in
Tables
4.N-12
and
4.N-13
of
the
Draft
EIR
(42,528
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
DSP
scenario,
41,893
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
DSP-V
scenario,
79,514
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
CPP
scenario,
and
76,447
net
new
vehicle
trips
per
day
for
the
CPP-V
scenario)
are
the
most
updated
estimates.
The
Final
EIR
includes
an
updated
estimation
of
Project
Site
development-
related
air
quality
and
GHG
emissions
based
on
the
latest
version
of
the
CalEEMod
model
and
the
most
updated
trip
generation
estimates.
The
updated
emission
inventory
is
provided
as
a
text
revision
in
Section
4.F,
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions
,
in
Volume
II
of
the
Final
EIR.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-34
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page