2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
preclude
repairs
being
performed
in
that
time
if
needed.
A
specific
timeline
is
not
set
in
Title
27
for
completion
of
repairs
since
the
nature
of
repairs
to
each
specific
landfill
after
an
earthquake
cannot
be
known.
Emergency
repairs
to
address
immediate
threats
to
public
health
and
the
environment
will
be
completed
quicker
than
more
complex
long-term
repairs.
A
7.0
magnitude
earthquake
is
the
applicable
design
event
pursuant
to
current
state
requirements.
Responsibilities
for
the
implementation
and
monitoring
of
all
mitigation
measures
are
outlined
in
the
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Program
(Final
EIR
Volume
I,
Chapter
4.0).
See
Mitigation
measure
4.E-3
set
forth
in
the
Draft
EIR
requires
all
proposed
improvements
to
include
a
site-specific
design
level
geotechnical
evaluation
with
recommendations
to
address
any
identified
liquefaction
hazards
in
accordance
with
current
building
code
requirements.
The
comment
includes
no
factual
basis
to
support
the
comment
suggestion
for
extending
the
investigation
500
or
1,000
feet
away
from
a
proposed
building.
Such
a
requirement
would
only
apply
if
there
were
any
other
structures
or
appurtenances
such
as
a
utility
corridor
proposed
in
which
case
the
geotechnical
investigation
would
cover
that
area
in
accordance
with
building
code
requirements.
The
final
paragraph
on
page
4.E-40
is
revised
to
read
as
follows:
Conclusion:
Because
the
potential
for
liquefaction
may
be
is
present
at
the
site
and
would
require
site-specific
analysis
to
determine
the
amount
of
potential
settlement
that
could
occur
this
impact
would
be
significant.
Mitigation
Measure
4.E-3
is
recommended
to
minimize
impacts
under
all
of
the
proposed
development
scenarios.
See
Response
The
current
status
of
compressible
Bay
Mud
at
the
Baylands
site
with
regards
to
slope
failure
is
described
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.E-23.
The
discussion
of
the
potential
for
Bay
Mud
to
fail
under
potential
new
loadings
from
fill
or
building
placement
is
discussed
on
pages
4.E-41
and
4.E-42,
disclosing
the
potential
hazard
that
would
require
further
quantitative
analysis
in
a
site-specific
geotechnical
investigation.
As
required
by
Draft
EIR
Mitigation
Measures
4.E-4a
and
4.E-4b,
all
proposed
development
would
require
site
specific
geotechnical
analysis,
including
implementation
of
recommended
measures
to
prevent
any
slope
failures
in
accordance
with
building
code
requirements.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-57
May
2015