2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
highways,
fire
and
police
protection
facilities
(including
establishment
of
a
second
police
beat
within
the
City),
parks,
and
(for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios)
schools
and
libraries.
Each
of
these
facilities
is
designed
to
serve
proposed
development
within
the
Baylands.
In
addition,
the
provision
of
fire
and
police
protection
facilities
(including
establishment
of
a
second
police
beat
within
the
City)
within
the
Baylands
will
improve
the
provision
of
services
to
existing
development
within
Sierra
Point
and
the
Brisbane
Marina.
OSEC-289
[See page
5-348 for the original comment]
As
stated
in
the
Draft
EIR
on
page
4.E-23,
no
landslide
hazards
other
than
one
on
the
west
side
of
Icehouse
Hill
have
been
identified
within
the
Baylands
Project
Site,
and
that
hazard
has
already
been
addressed
by
the
City.
The
comment
includes
no
factual
information
to
support
the
assertion
that
the
proposed
high
school
location
is
in
an
area
subject
to
damage
due
to
slides
from
Ice
House
Hill.
Regardless,
Mitigation
Measure
4.E-
4b
requires
all
site-specific
geotechnical
evaluations
including
the
one
for
the
proposed
high
school
to
include
a
slope
stability
analysis
to
address
the
stability
analyses
of
final
design
cut
and
fill
slopes,
including
recommendations
for
avoidance
of
slope
failure(s),
which
would
sufficiently
reduce
potential
impacts
to
less
than
significant.
[See page
5-348 for the original comment]
Remediation
of
existing
contamination
and
formal
landfill
closure
is
a
prerequisite
for,
and
must
be
completed
prior
to,
site-specific
development
within
the
former
landfill
and
within
OU-1
and
OU-2.
Pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-2a,
completion
of
remedial
action
plans
and
the
landfill
closure
plan
is
required
to
precede
approval
of
a
specific
plan
(and
therefore
development)
within
the
Baylands.
Prior
to
approval
for
any
site-specific
development
within
the
area
of
the
former
landfill,
landfill
closure
requirements
as
approved
by
the
Regional
Water
Quality
Control
Board
and
San
Mateo
County
Health
System
must
be
completed.
Prior
to
approval
for
any
site-specific
development
within
OU-1,
remedial
action
plan
requirements
as
approved
by
the
California
Department
of
Toxic
Substances
Control
must
be
completed.
Prior
to
approval
for
any
site-specific
development
within
OU-2,
remedial
action
plan
requirements
as
approved
by
the
Regional
Water
Quality
Control
Board
must
be
completed.
OSEC-291
[See page
5-348 for the original comment]
General
Plan
Policy
336
states
“Consider
methods
for
enhancing
interaction
between
the
residential
community
in
Central
Brisbane
and
uses
on
the
Baylands.
Methods
may
include
pedestrian,
bicycle
and
vehicular
connections,
recreational
uses
and
educational
facilities.”
OSEC-290
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-92
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page