[See page 5-355 for the original comment] The SF-CHAMP model includes growth projections for future development. In addition, future projects in the Baylands vicinity, including the Candlestick/Hunter’s Point development are assessed in the cumulative impact analysis. See Master Response 22 for discussion of the development projects included in the Draft EIR’s cumulative traffic analysis.
[See page 5-355 for the original comment] As explained in text on pages 4.O-5 and 4.O-6, Table 4.O-5 was not based on historical usage but rather is an estimation of water demand modeled by data provided by all SFPUC customers to predict future population increases and, thus, future increases in water demands.
[See page 5-355 for the original comment] The color of the lagoon boundary in Draft EIR Figure 4.O-1 has been changed to distinguish it from water lines.
[See page 5-355 for the original comment] To make the order of columns in Draft EIR Table 4.O-6 better correspond to the format of other tables in Section 4.O, Table 4.O-6 has been changed to read as follows:
TABLE 4.O-6
ANNUAL WASTEWATER FLOWS FOR BAYSHORE SANITARY DISTRICT, 2007-2011
| For Period Ending June 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | |||||
| Total Annual Flow (MG) | 141.75 |
140.80 |
137.30 | 144.57 |
148.17 |
| Daily Flow (mgd) | 0.38 | ||||
| NOTES: MG = million gallons, mgd = million gallons per day SOURCE: Adapted from Yeager, 2012 |
|||||
[See page 5-355 for the original comment] See Master Response 13 for discussion of the remediation review and approval process. As discussed in that Master Response, the use of any specific remediation method or technology has not been approved by either the RWQCB or DTSC. Such approvals will not occur until after the City of Brisbane determines what land uses are appropriate within the Baylands, updated human health risk assessments are completed, and risk-based cleanup goals are established by the RWQCB and DTSC. Please also see Responses OSEC-169 and OSEC-171 for a specific discussion of the potential use of “wick drains.”
[See page 5-355 for the original comment] As discussed in Draft EIR Section 4.H, Surface Water Hydrology and Water Quality, onsite storm drainage