[See page 5-360 for the original comment] The rationale for the selection of alternatives to be evaluated in the Draft EIR is provided starting at the end of page 5-1. Alternatives that were considered, but rejected, are described starting on page 5-8. Alternatives that were rejected from further reconsideration were not evaluated for their environmental impacts. The reasoning behind the identification of the environmentally superior alternative is set forth in Draft EIR Section 5.4.
[See page 5-360 for the original comment] Table 6-1 identifies the significant of impacts for proposed Baylands development, whereas the information presented on page 6-20 identifies the cumulative significance of proposed Baylands development in combination with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects.
Table 6-1 identifies the significant impacts of proposed Project Site development, while the table on page 6-20 identifies cumulative, rather than Baylands Project site development impacts. As discussed in the conclusion on page 4.C-47, implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.C-1g, 4.H-1a, 4.H-1b, and 4.H-4 would reduce Impact 4.C-1 to less than significant. Table 6-1 is therefore revised to read as follows:
