2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
The
recommendations
set
forth
in
Comment
CPA2-49
will
be
considered
as
part
of
the
planning
review
undertaken
by
the
City
for
the
Baylands.
CPA2-50
[See page
5-448 for the original comment]
Responses
to
the
summary
statements
in
this
comment
are
provided
in
Master Responses
30
through
34
and
in
the
responses
to
individual
comments
to
the
CPA
2
December
2013
comment
letter.
[See page
5-448 for the original comment]
See
Responses
CPA
2-45
and
2-46.
Mitigation
is
not
required
under
CEQA
unless
the
Lead
Agency
finds
that
a
significant
impact
would
occur
otherwise.
Architectural
Requirements
to
reduce
the
wind
effects
of
Project
Site
development
are
recommended
by
the
commenter,
and
can
be
considered
as
part
of
the
planning
review
undertaken
by
the
City
for
the
Baylands.
Responses
to
the
statements
in
this
comment
are
also
provided
in
Master Responses
30
through
34.
[See page
5-448 for the original comment]
See
Master Response
1
for
discussion
of
environmental
review
for
subsequent
development
projects
within
the
Baylands.
The
Draft
EIR’s
analysis
on
page
4.M-26
demonstrates
that
there
would
be
no
significant
impact
to
the
CPSRA
windsurfing
area
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
development
on
the
Baylands.
With
respect
to
the
need
for
“continued
reassessment
of
wind
and
sailability
impact,”
see
Response CPA
2-44
and
Master Response
34.
CPA2-53
[See page
5-448 for the original comment]
No
impact
is
identified
in
Draft
EIR
Section
4.B
,
Air
Quality,
that
would
require
an
alteration
of
the
existing
regulatory
environment
as
a
mitigation
measure.
See
Master Response
3
for
discussion
of
implementation
and
the
enforceability
of
mitigation
measures.
[See page
5-449 for the original comment]
Responses
to
the
statements
in
this
comment
are
provided
in
Master Responses
30
through
34.
[See page
5-449 for the original comment]
Responses
to
the
statements
in
this
comment
are
provided
in
Master Responses
30
through
34.
[See page
5-451 for the original comment]
This
comment
introduces
comments
that
follow
in
the
CPA
comment
letter
regarding
the
300
Airport
Boulevard
Final
EIR,
prepared
by
the
City
of
Burlingame
for
a
project
located
in
Burlingame
more
than
10
miles
south
of
the
Baylands.
Comment
2-56
does
not
address
proposed
development
within
the
Baylands,
nor
does
it
address
the
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
As
such,
this
comment
raises
no
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
Baylands
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
CPA2-51
CPA2-52
CPA2-54
CPA2-55
CPA2-56
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.4-23
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page