2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
2.9.10
San
Francisco
Boardsailing
Association
June
25,
2013
Comment
Letter
SFBA1-1
[See page
5-508 for the original comment]
The
most
important
details
concerning
the
wind
analysis
for
Project
Site
development
are
provided
in
the
Draft
EIR.
A
similar
level
of
detail
in
the
wind
analysis
was
carried
out
by
the
City
and
County
of
San
Francisco
in
the
EIR
for
the
Executive
Park
project.
Furthermore,
land
use
plans
for
proposed
Baylands
development
scenarios
were
modeled
conservatively
to
produce
the
greatest
effect
on
the
wind.
The
complexity
and
intensity
of
the
effect
of
Project
Site
development
and
the
Recology
expansion
on
the
CPSRA
windsurfing
area
is
sufficiently
modeled
in
the
wind
analysis
(see
Master Response 30
through
Master Response 34
for
discussion
of
the
wind
analysis
used
in
the
Draft
EIR).
The
effects
of
proposed
Baylands
development
and
Recology
expansion
(CPP-V
scenario
only)
on
the
CPSRA
windsurfing
resource
were
determined
in
the
Draft
EIR
to
be
less-than-
significant
(see
the
results
of
the
wind
analysis
for
the
CPP-V
scenario
on
page
4.M-25
to
4.M-26
of
the
Draft
EIR).
SFBA1-2
[See page
5-508 for the original comment]
This
comment
does
not
raise
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
The
City
will
consider
the
comment
as
part
of
its
planning
review
and
decisionmaking
for
the
Baylands.
January
22,
2014
Comment
Letter
SFBA2-1
[See page
5-509 for the original comment]
Responses
to
this
comment,
which
introduces
the
remaining
comments
in
Comment
Letter
SFBA
2
are
provided
in
the
Responses
SFBA2-2
through
SFBA2-12
and
in
Master Responses
30
through
34.
[See page
5-509 for the original comment]
The
San
Francisco
Bay
Area
Water
Trail
Act
primarily
focuses
on
protecting
launching
and
landing
sites
for
human-
powered
boats
and
beachable
sail
craft.
The
impact
analysis
for
the
Draft
EIR
evaluated
the
impacts
of
Project
Site
development
on
the
existing
CPSRA
launching
and
landing
site
and
determined
that
a
significant
impact
on
the
resource
would
not
result
due
to
Project
Site
development
(see
results
on
pages
4.M-25
to
4.M-26
of
the
Draft
EIR
and
Master Responses
30
through
34).
Regarding
the
water
area
where
windsurfing
impacts
were
analyzed,
the
area
of
the
windsurfing
resource
was
provided
by
SFBA
in
response
to
Baylands
Notices
SFBA2-2
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.10-1
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page