20132009, it would be considered consistent with Plan Bay Area projections only if employment growth in excess of projections was drawn from surrounding communities.

Page 5-28         BCC-771 [See page 5-295 for the original comment] REVISE the second paragraph as follows.

Land uses under the Renewable Energy Generation Alternative would include 170 acres of alternative energy uses consisting of a large PV solar farm, small vertical-axis wind turbines, wind turbines placed within development, and rooftop PV solar panels; 654,900 square feet of research and development facilities on 59 acres; and 173,800 square feet of retail/entertainment uses on 26 acres. Others uses at the site would include a new water treatment plant (seven acres) and relocated industrial uses (three acres). The remainder of the Project Site would be designated open space/public uses. The Recology expansion, adaptive reuse of the Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel Company buildings, relocation of the existing lumberyards, site remediation, and water supply agreement would occur as part of this alternative.

Page 5-41         BCC-473 [See page 5-253 for the original comment] REVISE the third complete paragraph to read as follows:

The Renewable Energy Generation Alternative would generate substantially fewer employment opportunities than projected citywide by ABAG’s Projections 20132009 for Brisbane, but more than projected in the preferred and alternative scenarios being considered in the draft Plan Bay Area. Overall, the Renewable Energy Generation Alternative would have a substantially reduced impact on population and housing conditions as compared to the Project Site development, avoiding the significant unavoidable impacts.

Page 5-66         BCC-766 [See page 5-296 for the original comment] ADD a new section prior to Section 5.4 to read as follows, renumbering the existing “Section 5.4,” Environmentally Superior Alternative, to “Section 5.5” and renumbering the existing “Section 5.5,” References, to “Section 5.6.”