Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Matrix (continued)

Significant Impact Being Mitigated

Mitigation Measure

Responsibility for Implementation

Enforcement Responsibility

Monitoring Responsibility/ Frequency

Actions Indicating Compliance

Surface Water Hydrology and Water Quality (cont.)

Bay Plan. Any BCDC requirements after review of the Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment report shall also be incorporated into Project design prior to issuance of a building permit. Sea level rise analyses shall be based on the California Climate Action Team’s sea level rise projections for the West Coast, unless otherwise substantiated to the satisfaction of BCDC. For site- specific development projects within the area subject to BCDC jurisdiction, discretionary permits from the City such as grading or building permits shall be obtained prior to final approval of the BCDC permit.

also require developments under BCDC jurisdiction shall submit design plans and a Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Report to BCDC in accordance with BCDC’s most current San Francisco Bay Plan policies.

Prior to approving permits for construction of development subject to the provisions of Mitigation Measure 4.H-8, the City Public Works shall ensure that the results of Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Reports are incorporated into the performance standards for implementation  of  Mitigation Measures 4.H-4b and 4.H-4c.

Land Use and Planning

General Plan Consistency

DSP, DSP-V, CPP, &

CPP-V scenarios

4.I-1: As noted in Chapter 3, Project Description, one of the components of the Project Site development is a General Plan Amendment that would ensure consistency with the Brisbane General Plan. Each of the inconsistencies identified in Table 4.I-1 shall be resolved prior to selection of a Concept Plan or approval of a Specific Plan for development within the Baylands through either modification(s) to the Concept Plan or Specific Plan or amendments to the Brisbane General Plan, as follows:

• Policy 38.1 (roadway level of service standards) – Recognizing that current roadway level of service standards (LOS D) will be exceeded due to future development in other cities even if no development within the Project Site occurs, modify General Plan roadway level of service standards to accommodate

The Applicant(s) for specific plan(s) shall include a proposed General Plan Amendment to provide consistency between their proposed specific plan and the General Plan as part of their application.

Should the City Council decide to select a Concept Plan scenario without adopting a specific plan, the Community Development Director shall provide text and figures for any needed modification to the General

City Council

The City shall not select a Concept Plan scenario or adopt any specific plan until the requirements of Mitigation Measure 4.I-1 have been met.

Prior to selection of a Concept Plan by the City Council and prior to adoption of any specific plan, the Community Development Department shall review any concurrently proposed General Plan Amendment to ensure that the Concept Plan and/or specific plan will be consistent with the General Plan as each may be proposed to be amended.

Selection of a Concept Plan scenario consistent with the Brisbane General Plan.

Approval of specific plan(s) consistent with the Brisbane General Plan.