2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
low.
With
the
inclusion
of
Mitigation
Measure
4.D-2,
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.D-
33–34,
Project
Site
development
would
not
cause
a
substantial
adverse
change
in
the
significance
of
archaeological
resources.
Regarding
the
potential
for
historic-era
shipwrecks
beneath
artificial
fill,
the
Draft
EIR
Section
4.E,
Geology,
Soils,
and
Seismicity
,
pages
4.E-8
states
that
the
former
landfill
portion
of
the
Baylands
Project
Site
(east
of
the
Caltrain
railroad
tracks)
is
underlain
by
artificial
fill
10-40
feet
thick,
and
the
former
railyard
portion
of
the
Baylands
Project
Site
(west
of
the
Caltrain
railroad
tracks)
is
underlain
by
artificial
fill
6-22
feet
thick.
Potential
historic-era
shipwrecks
that
may
have
been
present
on
the
San
Francisco
Bay
floor
before
placement
of
artificial
fill
would
be
located
beneath
the
thick
layers
of
artificial
fill.
Should
previously
unidentified
archeological
resources,
including
historic-era
shipwrecks,
be
inadvertently
discovered
during
Baylands
Project
Site
development,
Draft
EIR
Mitigation
Measure
4.D-2,
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.D-33
–
34
would
apply.
A
review
of
San
Mateo
County
Assessor
records
on
May
19,
2014
indicates
the
following
landowners
within
the
Baylands
Project
Site,
supplementing
the
identification
of
owners
in
Figure
Oyster
Point
Properties,
Inc.
(Universal
Paragon
Corporation)
Sierra
Hotel
Management
Corporation
(Universal
Paragon
Corporation)
Suntex
Properties,
Inc.
(Universal
Paragon
Corporation)
Tuntex
USA,
Inc.
(Universal
Paragon
Corporation)
City
of
Brisbane
Bayshore
Sanitary
District
California
State
Lands
Commission
City
and
County
of
San
Francisco
Recology
Properties,
Inc.
Sanitary
Fill
Company
(Recology)
Sunset
Scavenger
Company
(Recology)
Macor,
Inc.
(Recology)
Brisbane
Properties,
Inc.
(Sierra
Point
Lumber)
Robert
and
Helen
Carrol
Janet
Miller
and
Ronald
Dennis
Nadine
Prescott
Richard
J.
Lee
and
James
A.
Lee,
Jr.
Trust
Gertrude
S.
Ray
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.19-6
May
2015