2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
baseline
conditions.
See
7
for
discussion
of
the
use
of
2010
as
the
baseline
year
for
the
EIR.
The
effects
of
proposed
Project
Site
development
on
wind
in
the
Bay
and
the
“wind
shadow”
are
evaluated
in
Draft
EIR
Section
4.M,
Recreational
Resources
,
starting
on
page
4.M-22
and
discussed
and
various
responses
to
comments
from
comment
letter
CPA
2.
Existing
dust
conditions
caused
by
human
activities
would
be
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Bay
Area
Air
Quality
Management
District.
As
required
by
CEQA,
the
Draft
EIR
addresses
the
physical
changes
that
would
result
from
approval
of
any
of
the
four
Project
site
development
scenarios
as
compared
to
baseline
conditions.
Thus,
the
EIR
does
not
analyze
the
impacts
of
existing
dust
generation.
The
regulatory
authorities
of
the
RWQCB,
DTSC,
and
San
Mateo
County
Health
System
in
relation
to
hazardous
materials
remediation
for
formal
landfill
closure
are
described
in
Draft
Section
4.G,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials
.
The
regulatory
authority
of
other
agencies
as
it
affects
proposed
Project
Site
development
is
described
in
the
Regulatory
Setting
portion
of
Draft
EIR
Sections
4.A
through
4.P.
Authority
for
implementation
of
EIR
mitigation
measures
is
described
in
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR.
The
comment
does
not
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
The
“Community
Prepared
Plan”
(CPP)
scenario
was
developed
through
extensive
community
input,
including
a
series
of
public
meetings
that
focused
on
the
types
and
distribution
of
developed
land
and
open
space
uses
rather
than
on
proposed
development
intensity.
The
development
intensity
was
established
to
allow
for
a
worst-case
analysis
of
potential
environmental
impacts.
The
CPP
scenario
was
designated
for
study
in
this
EIR
at
an
equal
level
of
detail
to
the
developer-sponsored
plans
(DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios)
by
the
Brisbane
City
Council
in
2010.
The
name
of
the
CPP
scenario
is
not
intended
to
denote
community
acceptance
or
any
recommendation
by
the
Brisbane
community.
A
review
of
Figure
indicates
that
all
of
the
colors
used
in
the
graphic
are
present
in
the
key.
No
revisions
to
Figure
are
proposed.
Biological
resources
mitigation
measures
calling
for
avoidance
of
impacts
to
wetlands,
as
well
as
for
development
of
an
Open
Space
Plan
meeting
specified
performance
standards
would
lead
to
restoration
of
shoreline
wetland
habitat
along
the
edge
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.19-8
May
2015