2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
accordance
with
seismic
design
criteria
(as
stated
in
Mitigation
Measure
4.E-2a:
“The
report
shall
provide
site
-specific
construction
methods
and
recommendations
regarding
grading
activities,
fill
placement,
soil
corrosivity/expansion/erosion
potential,
compaction,
foundation
construction,
drainage
control
(both
surface
and
subsurface),
and
avoidance
of
settlement,
liquefaction,
differential
settlement,
and
seismic
hazards
in
accordance
with
current
California
Building
Code
requirements
including
Chapter
16,
Section
1613.”).
Therefore,
proposed
improvements
would
be
constructed
in
accordance
with
current
seismic
design
criteria
to
minimize
the
potential
damage
that
may
occur
from
an
anticipated
seismic
event.
Meeting3-4
[See page
5-674 for the original comment]
The
methods
to
be
used
to
ensure
implementation
of
EIR
mitigation
measures
is
contained
in
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR,
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Plan
.
[See page
5-674 for the original comment]
This
outdoor
nursery
lies
within
the
Baylands
Specific
plan
boundaries,
adjacent
to
the
Brisbane
Fire
Station,
and
is
accessed
from
Bayshore
Boulevard.
As
described
on
Draft
EIR
page
3-18,
the
nursery
includes
a
4,000
square
foot
greenhouse,
which
is
operating
as
an
interim
use.
The
current
development
plan
for
the
Baylands
under
all
four
scenarios
indicates
open
space
and
institutional
uses
in
the
area
of
the
nursery.
Meeting3-5
2.10.19.6
Kenji
Nishijima
Meeting3-6
[See page
5-675 for the original comment]
A
discussion
of
sea
level
rise
is
provided
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.H-7
and
4.H.8
and
depicted
on
Figure
4.H-4
and
analysis
of
impacts
is
provided
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.H-37
through
4.H-39.
Mitigation
Measure
4.H-8
would
ensure
that
implementation
of
future
site-
specific
Project
Site
development
would
not
result
in
significant
impacts
due
to
sea
level
rise.
[See page
5-676 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 24
for
discussion
of
Transportation
Demand
Management
Measures.
As
indicated
in
Table
6-1
and
Section
4.N,
Traffic
and
Circulation
,
even
with
implementation
of
Mitigation
Measures
4.N-1a
through
1h,
4.N-3a
through
3h,
4.N-4,
4.N-5,
4.N-7,
4.N-9,
4/N-10,
4.N-11,
4.N-12,
4.N-13,
and
4.N-17,
several
significant
unavoidable
impacts
will
remain.
[See page
5-677 for the original comment]
See
Response Meeting
3-7.
[See page
5-677 for the original comment]
Seismic
hazards
are
discussed
in
Draft
EIR
Section
4.E,
Geology,
Soils,
and
Seismicity
,
which
includes
a
description
of
seismic
hazards
affecting
the
Baylands
site
as
well
as
mitigation
to
minimize
risks
from
seismic
hazards
at
the
Baylands
site.
No
changes
to
the
Draft
EIR
were
requested
or
are
recommended
in
response
to
this
comment.
Meeting3-7
Meeting3-8
Meeting3-9
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.19-25
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page