2.
Response
to
Comments
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
Meeting3-14
[See page
5-681 for the original comment]
See
Response Meeting
3-7.
Meeting3-15
[See page
5-681 for the original comment]
As
discussed
in
Section
4.B,
Air
Quality
,
and
as
indicated
in
Table
6-1,
air
quality
impacts
will
remain
significant
and
unavoidable
for
each
of
the
four
development
scenarios,
even
with
implementation
of
all
feasible
mitigation
measures.
See
Master Response
6
for
discussion
of
“significant
unavoidable”
as
compared
to
“unacceptable”
impacts.
2.10.19.7
Fran
Martin
Meeting3-10
[See page
5-678 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 19
for
discussion
of
land
use
compatibility
between
proposed
Baylands
development
and
existing
uses
in
Visitacion
Valley.
Meeting3-11
[See page
5-678 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 19
for
discussion
of
land
use
compatibility
between
proposed
Baylands
development
and
existing
uses
in
Visitacion
Valley.
Meeting3-12
[See page
5-679 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 19
for
discussion
of
land
use
compatibility
between
proposed
Baylands
development
and
existing
uses
in
Visitacion
Valley.
See
also
Draft
EIR
Section
6.3,
Cumulative
Impacts
,
for
a
discussion
of
the
impacts
of
Project
Site
development
in
combination
with
other
past,
present,
and
reasonably
foreseeable
projects,
including
redevelopment
of
the
Schlage
Lock
site
in
San
Francisco.
Meeting3-13
[See page
5-679 for the original comment]
See
Master Response 19
for
discussion
regarding
land
use
compatibility
between
proposed
Baylands
development
and
existing
uses
in
Visitacion
Valley.
See
Master Response 20
for
discussion
regarding
land
use
compatibility
of
the
Recology
facility
and
surrounding
lands.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.10.19-26
May
2015
Previous Page |