2.
Response
to
Comments
2.3
Introduction
to
Responses
to
Comments
2.4.33
Windsurfing:
Alternative
Analysis
Methodology
2.4.34
Windsurfing:
Adequacy
of
the
Project
Description
used
in
Analyzing
Impacts
of
Windsailing
2.4.35
Alternatives:
Comparison
of
Project
Development
Scenarios
and
Alternatives
Sections
2.5
through
2.10
include
responses
to
each
individual
comment,
although
a
response
may
sometimes
refer
to
either
a
master
response
or
another
response.
The
responses
to
the
individual
comment
letters
in
Sections
2.5
through
2.10
are
organized
as
follows:
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
State
Agencies
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Regional
Agencies
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Special
Districts
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Individuals
Many
comments
received
on
the
Draft
EIR
raised
planning
issues
or
provided
background
information,
and
did
not
address
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
Such
comments
did
not
identify
any
significant
environmental
issue
requiring
a
response.
While
the
City,
as
the
CEQA
Lead
Agency,
acknowledges
their
receipt,
only
limited
responses
are
provided
to
comments
that
do
not
address
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR,
its
analyses
and
conclusions,
or
that
do
not
identify
any
significant
environmental
issue.
Where
a
response
to
a
comment
requires
revisions
to
the
text
of
the
Draft
EIR,
such
revisions
are
shown
in
underline
for
additions
and
strikethrough
for
deletions.
Chapter
3
of
the
Final
EIR
contains
a
consolidated
set
of
all
changes
made
to
the
Draft
EIR
that
resulted
from:
(1)
changes
made
in
response
to
the
comments
received
on
the
Draft
EIR;
or
(2)
City
staff-initiated
changes
to
correct
errors
or
to
clarify
information
presented
in
the
Draft
EIR.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.3-3
May
2015