2.
Response
to
Comments
2.3
Introduction
to
Responses
to
Comments
2.4.16
Master Response 16,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials:
Liability
in
relation
to
Potential
Hazards;
Indemnification
of
the
City
from
Possible
Future
Loss
of
Property
of
Use
2.4.17
Master Response 17,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials:
Potential
for
Cross-
Contamination
and
Cumulative
Effects
of
Multiple
Toxins
2.4.18
Master Response 18,
Land
Use:
Is
a
Public
Vote
Required
to
Amend
the
Brisbane
General
Plan?
2.4.19
Master Response,
19,
Land
Use:
Environmental
Impacts
and
Land
Use
Compatibility
in
Relation
to
Specific
Locations
2.4.20
Master Response 20,
Land
Use:
Environmental
Impacts
and
Land
Use
Compatibility
in
Relation
to
the
Proposed
Recology
Expansion
2.4.21
Master Response 21,
Public
Services
and
Utilities:
Responsibilities
for
Construction
and
Maintenance
of
Public
Facilities
and
Infrastructure
Needed
for
Baylands
Development
2.4.22
Master Response 22,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Land
Use
Growth
and
Related
Traffic
Volume
Used
to
Forecast
Baseline
Traffic
under
Cumulative
Conditions
2.4.23
Master Response 23,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Impacts
of
the
Proposed
Project
on
US
101
Mainline
Segments
under
both
Existing
and
Cumulative
Conditions
2.4.24
Master Response 24,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Applicability
of
Using
TDM
Measures
to
Mitigate
Impacts
Caused
to
C/CAG’s
Congestion
Management
Program
(CMP)
Network
2.4.25
Master Response 25,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Jobs
and
Housing
Linkage;
Calculation
of
Internal
Capture
in
Project
Trip
Generation
2.4.26
Master Response 26,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Closely
Spaced
Intersections
--
Consideration
of
Queue
Spillback
from
Other
Road
Facilities
at
Study
Intersections
2.4.27
Master Response 27,
Traffic
and
Circulation:
Inclusion
of
New
Development
in
Existing
Baseline
(No
Project)
Traffic
Volume
2.4.28
Master Response 28,
Traffic
and
Transportation:
Location
of
the
Bayshore
Caltrain
Station
Assumed
in
the
Draft
EIR
2.4.29
Master Response 29,
Water
Supply:
Assured
Water
Supply
for
Proposed
Baylands
Development
in
Relation
to
the
Need
for
Future
Engineering
Design
and
CEQA
Documentation
for
Specific
Methods
and
Facilities
for
Water
Delivery
2.4.30
Master Response 30,
Windsurfing:
Significance
Criteria
for
Analysis
of
Windsurfing
Impacts
2.4.31
Master Response 31,
Windsurfing:
Use
of
a
Wind
Tunnel
in
Analyzing
Wind
Impacts
2.4.32
Master Response 32,
Windsurfing:
Windsurfing
Area
at
the
Candlestick
Point
State
Recreation
Area
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.3-2
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page