2.
Response
to
Comments
2.6
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Regional
Agencies
levels
from
aircraft
are
a
community
concern.”
The
appropriateness
of
locating
noise-
sensitive
uses
within
the
Baylands
will
be
considered
as
part
of
the
City’s
planning
review
and
decisionmaking.
C/CAG
Because
the
FAA
Notice
of
Proposed
Construction
extends
into
the
Brisbane
Lagoon
and
not
into
any
area
within
the
Baylands
where
structures
are
proposed,
this
comment
does
not
raise
any
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
City/County
Association
of
Governments
of
San
Mateo
County
Letter
Dated
November
12,
2013
C/CAG
2-1
As
stated
in
Comment
C/CAG
2-1,
Section
4.N,
Traffic
and
Circulation
,
is
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
San
Mateo
County
Congestion
Management
Program,
“which
requires
mitigation
measures
for
land
use
changes
and
development
projects
that
are
projected
to
significantly
impact
or
generate
more
than
100
new,
net
peak
hour
trips
on
the
CMP
roadway
network.”
Mitigation
Measures
4.N-3f
and
4.N-4
require
fair
share
contribution
from
Project
Site
development
for
Bi-County
improvements.
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-13
requires
preparation
of
a
TDM
program,
including
submission
of
the
program
to
C/CAG
for
approval.
C/CAG
2-2
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.6.3-2
May
2015