2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
the
provision
of
these
facilities
(e.g.,
by
providing
for
continuous
sidewalks
along
streets,
enhanced
pedestrian
crossings
at
key
intersections,
comprehensive
system
of
on-
and
off-street
bicycle
routes).
See
Draft
EIR
page
4.N-76
for
more
information
on
how
mode
split
between
vehicular
and
non-vehicular
transportation
was
developed.
SFMTA-23
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
Land
use
and
transportation
network
assumptions
for
Candlestick
Point-Hunters
Point
Shipyard
were
based
on
the
project’s
Draft
EIR.
This
information
was
the
best
available
at
the
time
of
NOP
and
the
initiation
of
traffic
studies
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands.
It
is
noted
that
both
the
land
use
and
transportation
network
for
Candlestick
Point
-
Hunters
Point
Shipyard
has
evolved
and
is
continuing
to
evolve
since
certification
of
the
project
EIR.
Changes
to
the
Candlestick
Point
-
Hunters
Point
Shipyard
transportation
network
would
not
change
the
transportation
impact
assessment
of
the
project.
The
Candlestick
Point
--Hunters
Point
Shipyard
EIR
exhibits
will
be
deleted
from
the
Baylands
EIR
since
they
are
not
relevant
to
the
Baylands
EIR.
[See
page
5-71
for
the
original
comment]
See
Response SFPD-4.
Also,
as
demonstrated
by
the
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Program
set
forth
in
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR,
each
of
the
Mitigation
Measures
set
forth
in
the
EIR
are,
in
fact,
enforceable.
Because
the
Baylands
EIR
is
a
programmatic
document
prepared
at
the
early
stages
of
the
planning
process,
some
mitigation
measures
of
necessity
rely
on
later
subsequently
prepared
plans.
Whenever
a
mitigation
measure
relies
on
a
subsequent
plan
or
action,
the
measure
contains
an
enforceable
performance
standard
as
required
by
CEQA.
See
Master Response
3
for
discussion
regarding
the
enforceability
of
mitigation
measures
and
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR,
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Program,
for
discussion
regarding
what
would
occur
in
the
event
an
implementation
measure
is
not
successfully
implemented.
[See page
5-71 for the original comment]
The
proposed
development
being
analyzed
includes
a
concept
plan
and
General
Plan
level
information
for
all
four
scenarios
and
specific
plan
level
information
regarding
development
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios.
No
site-specific
development
projects
have
been
proposed,
neither
have
any
specific
tenants
for
onsite
development
been
identified
with
the
exception
of
Recology
modernization
and
expansion
in
the
CPP-V
scenario.
Because
only
the
types
of
businesses
that
would
be
permitted
under
each
scenario
are
known
at
this
time,
only
a
general
TDM
program
could
be
formulated.
[See page
5-71 for the original comment]
Implementation
requirements
for
EIR
mitigation
measures
are
presented
in
the
Mitigation
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Program,
Chapter
4.0
of
the
Final
EIR.
SFMTA-24
SFMTA-25
SFMTA-26
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.3-22
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page