2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
SFMTA-17
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
The
proposed
Geneva
Avenue
extension
is
planned
to
have
buffered
bike
lanes
in
both
directions.
The
curb
parking
lane
would
be
open
to
vehicular
traffic
during
peak
hours,
not
the
bike
lane.
Footnote
“b”
on
Table
4.N
-7
of
the
Draft
EIR
is
revised
to
read
as
follows:
b
During
peak
hours,
the
curb
parking
bicycle
lanes
would
be
open
to
through
vehicular
traffic.
5
bicycle
lanes
would
be
provided
adjacent
to
the
curb,
next
to
the
sidewalk.
SFMTA-18
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
The
provision
of
new
bike
lanes
and
sharrows
in
San
Francisco
north
of
the
Baylands
does
not
necessitate
revision
of
the
Draft
EIR.
The
two
locations
cited
in
Comment
SFMTA-18
are
well
separated
from
the
Baylands
Project
Site
and
would
not
be
impacted
by
Baylands
Project
Site
traffic.
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
Information
for
related
projects,
which
include
land
use
development
profile
were
taken
from
the
latest
environmental
documents
available
at
the
time
of
NOP,
which
is
consistent
with
the
time
traffic
studies
for
the
Baylands
EIR
were
initiated.
The
transportation
analysis
was
conducted
for
Brisbane
Baylands
based
on
the
information
obtained
at
that
time.
See
Master Response 24
for
more
information
on
land
use
growth
used
to
forecast
future
baseline
traffic
conditions
under
Cumulative
Conditions.
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
The
graphic
on
page
4.N-31
was
obtained
from
the
2013
Bi-County
Transportation
Study,
published
by
the
San
Francisco
County
Transportation
(SFCTA).
Its
intent
was
to
illustrate
the
20-year,
$548
million
(in
2010
dollars)
transportation
improvement
program
in
the
vicinity
of
the
Baylands
site.
Figures
4.N-9
and
4.N-10
were
obtained
from
the
2012
Bayshore
Intermodal
Access
Study,
published
by
the
San
Francisco
County
Transportation
(SFCTA)
and
were
intended
to
represent
the
best
available
information
on
the
Geneva-Harney
BRT
alignment
options
at
time
of
NOP
for
Brisbane
Baylands.
The
intent
of
these
graphics
was
to
illustrate
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
network
proposed
for
Project
Site
development,
which
is
shown
in
Figure
4.N-17.
Mitigation
Measures
4.N-10
and
4.N-11
refer
to
site
specific
pedestrian
and
bicycle
impacts.
SFMTA-19
SFMTA-20
SFMTA-21
SFMTA-22
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
See
Response SFMTA-5.
[See page
5-70 for the original comment]
As
stated
in
the
Draft
EIR
on
page
4.N-60,
each
of
the
Baylands
development
scenarios
proposes
a
network
of
pedestrian
and
bicycle
paths
across
the
Baylands
site
to
facilitate
access
and
mobility
to
the
mix
of
land
uses
and
transit
facilities.
Development
of
the
Baylands
site
also
would
establish
streetscape
standards
and
guidelines
to
ensure
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.3-21
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page